PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 2021Energies52 citationsOpen Access

Life Cycle Assessment of Stationary Storage Systems within the Italian Electric Network

MCMaria Leonor CarvalhoATAndrea TemporelliPGPierpaolo Girardi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The introduction of stationary storage systems into the Italian electric network is necessary to accommodate the increasing share of energy from non-programmable renewable sources and to reach progressive decarbonization targets. In this framework, a life cycle assessment is a suitable tool to assess environmental impacts during the entire life cycle of stationary storage systems, i.e., their sustainability. A Li-ion battery (lithium–iron–phosphate (LFP), nickel–manganese–cobalt (NMC) 532, and NMC 622) entire life cycle assessment (LCA) based on primary and literature data was performed. The LCA results showed that energy consumption (predominantly during cell production), battery design (particularly binder choice), inventory accuracy, and data quality are key aspects that can strongly affect results. Regarding the battery construction phase, LFP batteries showed better performance than the NMC ones, but when the end-of-life (EoL) stage was included, NMC cell performance became very close to those of LFPs. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses, done using the Monte Carlo methodology, confirmed that the results (except for the freshwater eutrophication indicator) were characterized by a low dispersion and that the energy mix choice, during the different battery life phases, was able to greatly influence the overall impact. The use of primary and updated data related to battery cell production, like those used in the present paper, was necessary to obtain reliable results, and the application to a European production line is an item of novelty of this paper.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carvalho et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02d2b2daa0ebdf9f9e3700https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Lithium-Ion and Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles2011 · 659 citations
  2. 2Battery-Management System (BMS) and SOC Development for Electrical Vehicles2010 · 694 citations
  3. 3Environmental impacts of Lithium Metal Polymer and Lithium-ion stationary batteries2017 · 117 citations
  4. 4Research gaps in environmental life cycle assessments of lithium ion batteries for grid-scale stationary energy storage systems: End-of-life options and other issues2019 · 150 citations
  5. 5Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for greenhouse gas emissions2016 · 163 citations