PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 24, 2020Environmental Research Letters76 citationsOpen Access

Drone data reveal heterogeneity in tundra greenness and phenology not captured by satellites

JAJakob J. AssmannIMIsla H. Myers‐SmithJKJeffrey T. Kerby

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Data across scales are required to monitor ecosystem responses to rapid warming in the Arctic and to interpret tundra greening trends.Here, we tested the correspondence among satellite-and drone-derived seasonal change in tundra greenness to identify optimal spatial scales for vegetation monitoring on Qikiqtaruk-Herschel Island in the Yukon Territory, Canada.We combined time-series of the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) from multispectral drone imagery and satellite data (Sentinel-2, Landsat 8 and MODIS) with ground-based observations for two growing seasons (2016 and 2017).We found high cross-season correspondence in plot mean greenness (drone-satellite Spearman's 0.67-0.87)and pixel-by-pixel greenness (drone-satellite R 2 0.58-0.69)for eight one-hectare plots, with drones capturing lower NDVI values relative to the satellites.We identified a plateau in the spatial variation of tundra greenness at distances of around half a metre in the plots, suggesting that these grain sizes are optimal for monitoring such variation in the two most common vegetation types on the island.We further observed a notable loss of seasonal variation in the spatial heterogeneity of landscape greenness (46.2%-63.9%)when aggregating from ultra-fine-grain drone pixels (approx.0.05 m) to the size of medium-grain satellite pixels (10-30 m).Finally, seasonal changes in drone-derived greenness were highly correlated with measurements of leaf-growth in the ground-validation plots (mean Spearman's 0.70).These findings indicate that multispectral drone measurements can capture temporal plant growth dynamics across tundra landscapes.Overall, our results demonstrate that novel technologies such as drone platforms and compact multispectral sensors allow us to study ecological systems at previously inaccessible scales and fill gaps in our understanding of tundra ecosystem processes.Capturing fine-scale variation across tundra landscapes will improve predictions of the ecological impacts and climate feedbacks of environmental change in the Arctic.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Assmann et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02da214f17ebd43865179ahttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbf7d
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An Alpine Snowbank Environment and Its Effects on Vegetation, Plant Development, and Productivity1959 · 474 citations
  2. 2Tundra plants and climate change: the International Tundra Experiment (ITEX)1997 · 442 citations
  3. 3Changes in Vegetation Phenology and Productivity in Alaska Over the Past Two Decades2020 · 22 citations
  4. 4Vegetation monitoring using multispectral sensors — best practices and lessons learned from high latitudes2018 · 173 citations
  5. 5The response of Arctic vegetation to the summer climate: relation between shrub cover, NDVI, surface albedo and temperature2011 · 182 citations