PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 28, 2012Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews219 citationsOpen Access

A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code

View Full Paper
FCFrancisco Javier Conde ColladoJGJesús Guallar

Key Points

  • To review and evaluate optimized heliostat field layout designs generated by the Campo code for maximizing annual energy collection in solar power tower plants.
  • Reviewed computational optimization methods using the Campo code, which calculates individual heliostat shadowing and blocking factors.
  • Evaluated an optimization sequence that begins with dense heliostat distributions and progressively expands spacing to maximize optical energy yield.
  • Analyzed application examples using available baseline parameters from Gemasolar, a commercial solar power tower plant with molten salt storage.
  • Demonstrated that the Campo optimization search provides a steady, reproducible procedure for determining optimal heliostat field layouts.
  • Showed that progressively expanding dense layouts effectively balances initial optical performance against shadowing and blocking losses.
  • Provided practical layout configurations that improve annual energy collection efficiency relative to non-optimized solar power tower fields.

Abstract

Solar power tower (SPT) systems are viewed as one of the most promising technologies for producing solar electricity, in which direct solar radiation is reflected and concentrated by a field of giant mirrors (heliostats) onto a receiver placed at the top of a tower. However, the optimized design of a heliostat field is a rather complex problem because the annual performance of a heliostat is a function of not only the instants of time considered and its own position, but also the relative location of neighbouring heliostats, which cause shadows and blockings. A variety of procedures may be found in the open literature, although there is great lack of information on the details of an optimized layout. This review shows that these complex problems have partially led to the expansion of parabolic trough technologies in USA and Spain in spite of their lower thermodynamic efficiencies compared with solar tower power. As a modest support of SPT systems, the authors have presented elsewhere the abilities of a new code called campo for fast and accurate calculations of the shadowing and blocking factor for each and every heliostat. This work explores a review of the optimized heliostat field layouts yielded by campo. Campo commences the optimization search based on the densest layout, with the worst shadowing and blocking factor, but with good values for the other optical factors, and then progresses towards gradually expanded distributions. The search for maximum annual energy through campo results in a clear, steady and reproducible procedure. Finally, as an example of this new procedure, some options of optimized heliostat field layouts are reviewed using as input parameters the scarce open literature data on Gemasolar, the first solar power tower commercial plant with molten salt storage in the world.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Collado et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a032b654f17ebd4386527d9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.076
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Research on the Layout of Tower-type Concentrated Solar Power Plants Based on the Ray Tracing Method2024
  2. 2Comprehensive Optimization of Optical Efficiency and Thermal Power Output in Tower Solar Thermal Power Stations2024
  3. 3Research on Multi-Objective Optimization of Heliostat Field Based on DELSOL3 Layout2024
  4. 4Optimized design of a heliostat mirror field2024
  5. 5Methodological Study on Heliostat Configuration Optimization in Tower Solar Thermal Systems2024