PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2017Sarcoma22 citationsOpen Access

Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Uterine Adenosarcoma

MNMichael J. NathensonACAnthony P. ConleyHLHeather Lin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study retrospectively evaluated overall survival (OS) by treatment of recurrent or metastatic uterine adenosarcoma including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy and evaluated OS and progression-free survival (PFS) after 1st line systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: 78 patients with recurrent or metastatic adenosarcoma comprised the study population. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS. The log-rank test was performed to test the difference in survival between groups. RESULTS: =0.15. The response rate (CR + PR) per RECIST 1.1 for chemotherapy was 31.2% for doxorubicin-based regimens and 14.3% for gemcitabine/docetaxel. OS since 1st line chemotherapy was not significantly different among chemotherapy regimens. However, the median PFS was superior for doxorubicin/ifosfamide (15.4 months) compared to gemcitabine/docetaxel (5.0 months), platinum-based regimens (5.7 mo), or other doxorubicin-based regimens (6.5 months). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that surgery is an important treatment modality for recurrent or metastatic uterine adenosarcoma, and the most effective chemotherapeutics are doxorubicin/ifosfamide and gemcitabine/docetaxel.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nathenson et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0353a167f6ea5cc87598cfhttps://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4680273
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper