PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 17, 2022European Journal of Heart Failure46 citationsOpen Access

Baroreflex activation therapy with the Barostim ™ device in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a patient level meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

View Full Paper
ACAndrew J.S. CoatsWAWilliam T. AbrahamMZMichael R. Zile

Structured PICO

Does baroreflex activation therapy improve exercise capacity, quality of life, and NYHA class in patients with HFrEF?

P
Population
554 randomized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
I
Intervention
Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) added to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT)
C
Comparator
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) alone
O
Outcome
6-month changes in 6-min hall walk (6MHW) distance, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) QoL score, NT-proBNP, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classpatient reported

In an IPD meta-analysis of HFrEF patients, baroreflex activation therapy added to GDMT significantly improved exercise capacity, quality of life, and NYHA class at 6 months compared to GDMT alone.

Abstract

AIMS: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality, poor quality of life (QoL) and significant exercise limitation. Sympatho-vagal imbalance has been shown to predict adverse prognosis and symptoms in HFrEF, yet it has not been specifically targeted by any guideline-recommended device therapy to date. Barostim™, which directly addresses this imbalance, is the first Food and Drug Administration approved neuromodulation technology for HFrEF. We aimed to analyse all randomized trial evidence to evaluate the effect of baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) on heart failure symptoms, QoL and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed on all eligible trials that randomized HFrEF patients to BAT + guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) or GDMT alone (open label). Endpoints included 6-month changes in 6-min hall walk (6MHW) distance, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) QoL score, NT-proBNP, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in all patients and three subgroups. A total of 554 randomized patients were included. In all patients, BAT provided significant improvement in 6MHW distance of 49 m (95% confidence interval CI 33, 64), MLWHF QoL of -13 points (95% CI -17, -10), and 3.4 higher odds of improving at least one NYHA class (95% CI 2.3, 4.9) when comparing from baseline to 6 months. These improvements were similar, or better, in patients who had baseline NT-proBNP <1600 pg/ml, regardless of the cardiac resynchronization therapy indication status. CONCLUSION: An IPD meta-analysis suggests that BAT improves exercise capacity, NYHA class, and QoL in HFrEF patients receiving GDMT. These clinically meaningful improvements were consistent across the range of patients studies. BAT was also associated with an improvement in NT-proBNP in subjects with a lower baseline NT-proBNP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coats et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03777aff0a4a103d01d56bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2573
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper