PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 2026European Heart Journal35 citationsOpen Access

Impact of left ventricular volume/mass ratio on diastolic function

View Full Paper
ABAdisai BuakhamsriZPZoran PopovićJLJing‐Na Lin

Structured PICO

Does left ventricular volume/mass ratio independently predict diastolic function parameters in patients with cardiomyopathy and healthy controls?

P
Population
135 subjects including 44 healthy controls, 35 subjects with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), 29 subjects with dilated cardiomyopathy and narrow QRS complex (DCM-n), and 27 subjects with dilated cardiomyopathy and wide QRS complex (DCM-w).
I
Intervention
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) volume/mass ratio
O
Outcome
Diastolic function parameters including mitral annulus velocity (Ea), transmitral E-wave velocity, LV flow propagation velocity (Vp), early intraventricular pressure gradient (IVPG), LV twist, and peak untwisting rate (UntwR)surrogate

Left ventricular volume/mass ratio significantly influences diastolic function parameters independent of intrinsic diastolic function and filling pressures, and should be considered when assessing suspected LV diastolic dysfunction.

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the impact of left ventricular (LV) volume/mass ratio on diastolic function parameters in subjects with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and healthy controls. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed echocardiography in 44 healthy controls, 35 HCM subjects, 29 DCM subjects with narrow QRS complex (DCM-n), and 27 DCM subjects with wide QRS complex (DCM-w). Mitral annulus velocity (E(a)) and transmitral E-wave velocity were used to estimate time constant of isovolumic pressure decay (tau). LV flow propagation velocity (V(p)) and early intraventricular pressure gradient (IVPG) were derived from colour M-mode of LV inflow. We calculated LV twist and peak untwisting rate (UntwR) by speckle tracking. Mean LV volume/mass ratio was 0.34 +/- 0.09 mL/g in healthy controls, 0.15 +/- 0.06 mL/g in HCM, 0.6 +/- 0.2 mL/g in DCM-n, and 0.8 +/- 0.3 mL/g in DCM-w patients (P < 0.001 for all groups). Resting LV ejection fractions were 63 +/- 7, 64 +/- 8, 31 +/- 8, and 26 +/- 8%, respectively (P < 0.01 vs. controls for DCM groups). In a multivariate analysis, LV volume/mass ratio remained a strong independent predictor of V(p) (P < 0.001), IVPG (P = 0.009), and UntwR (P < 0.001) but not for E(a) (P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: LV volume/mass ratio had influences on diastolic function parameters independent of intrinsic diastolic function and filling pressures. It should be considered when assessing patients suspected of LV diastolic dysfunction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buakhamsri et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03999153daab268d2bc13ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper