PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 2019Journal of Educational Psychology261 citations

Has achievement goal theory been right? A meta-analysis of the relation between goal structures and personal achievement goals.

View Full Paper
LBLisa BardachSOSophie OczlonJPJakob Pietschnig

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Achievement goal theory includes both personal motivational features (achievement goals) and contextual features (goal structures). The theory holds that the prevailing goal structures in learning environments (such as the classroom) influence the achievement goals students adopt. This meta-analysis (k = 68, N = 47,975) examined the strength of the relationships between student ratings of goal structures (mastery-approach goal structures, mastery-avoidance goal structures, performance-approach goal structures, and performance-avoidance goal structures) and achievement goals (mastery-approach goals, mastery-avoidance goals, performance-approach goals, and performance-avoidance goals) as well as moderating variables. Results indicated that each achievement goal was most strongly related to its contextual counterpart. Educational level and world region moderated some of the relations, and for most combinations of goal structures and achievement goals, measures framing goal structures as a climate produced higher correlations than measures using the teacher as referent. Challenges and promising routes for future research and theory building are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bardach et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03ad6c2ca770c848de06d5https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000419
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper