PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 3, 2017animal56 citationsOpen Access

Review: To be or not to be an identifiable model. Is this a relevant question in animal science modelling?

View Full Paper
RMRafael Muñoz‐TamayoLPLaurence PuilletJDJean‐Baptiste Daniel

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

What is a good (useful) mathematical model in animal science? For models constructed for prediction purposes, the question of model adequacy (usefulness) has been traditionally tackled by statistical analysis applied to observed experimental data relative to model-predicted variables. However, little attention has been paid to analytic tools that exploit the mathematical properties of the model equations. For example, in the context of model calibration, before attempting a numerical estimation of the model parameters, we might want to know if we have any chance of success in estimating a unique best value of the model parameters from available measurements. This question of uniqueness is referred to as structural identifiability; a mathematical property that is defined on the sole basis of the model structure within a hypothetical ideal experiment determined by a setting of model inputs (stimuli) and observable variables (measurements). Structural identifiability analysis applied to dynamic models described by ordinary differential equations (ODEs) is a common practice in control engineering and system identification. This analysis demands mathematical technicalities that are beyond the academic background of animal science, which might explain the lack of pervasiveness of identifiability analysis in animal science modelling. To fill this gap, in this paper we address the analysis of structural identifiability from a practitioner perspective by capitalizing on the use of dedicated software tools. Our objectives are (i) to provide a comprehensive explanation of the structural identifiability notion for the community of animal science modelling, (ii) to assess the relevance of identifiability analysis in animal science modelling and (iii) to motivate the community to use identifiability analysis in the modelling practice (when the identifiability question is relevant). We focus our study on ODE models. By using illustrative examples that include published mathematical models describing lactation in cattle, we show how structural identifiability analysis can contribute to advancing mathematical modelling in animal science towards the production of useful models and, moreover, highly informative experiments via optimal experiment design. Rather than attempting to impose a systematic identifiability analysis to the modelling community during model developments, we wish to open a window towards the discovery of a powerful tool for model construction and experiment design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muñoz‐Tamayo et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03b15494ec7ec37ca9c874https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731117002774
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Identification of parametric models : from experimental data1997 · 1,219 citations
  2. 2Mathematical modelling in agricultural science1988 · 9 citations
  3. 3On structural identifiability1970 · 877 citations
  4. 4Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models2006 · 749 citations
  5. 5Modelling genetic networks with noisy and varied experimental data: the circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana2005 · 241 citations