PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 13, 2017Clinical Neurophysiology105 citationsOpen Access

Ear-EEG detects ictal and interictal abnormalities in focal and generalized epilepsy – A comparison with scalp EEG monitoring

IZIvan C. ZibrandtsenPKPreben KidmoseCCChristian Bech Christensen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ear-EEG is recording of electroencephalography from a small device in the ear. This is the first study to compare ictal and interictal abnormalities recorded with ear-EEG and simultaneous scalp-EEG in an epilepsy monitoring unit. METHODS: We recorded and compared simultaneous ear-EEG and scalp-EEG from 15 patients with suspected temporal lobe epilepsy. EEGs were compared visually by independent neurophysiologists. Correlation and time-frequency analysis was used to quantify the similarity between ear and scalp electrodes. Spike-averages were used to assess similarity of interictal spikes. RESULTS: There were no differences in sensitivity or specificity for seizure detection. Mean correlation coefficient between ear-EEG and nearest scalp electrode was above 0.6 with a statistically significant decreasing trend with increasing distance away from the ear. Ictal morphology and frequency dynamics can be observed from visual inspection and time-frequency analysis. Spike averages derived from ear-EEG electrodes yield a recognizable spike appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ear-EEG can reliably detect electroencephalographic patterns associated with focal temporal lobe seizures. Interictal spike morphology from sufficiently large temporal spike sources can be sampled using ear-EEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Ear-EEG is likely to become an important tool in clinical epilepsy monitoring and diagnosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zibrandtsen et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03f150698efa300d893940https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.115
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper