PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 9, 2016Biogeosciences67 citationsOpen Access

Variations of leaf N and P concentrations in shrubland biomes across northernChina: phylogeny, climate, and soil

View Full Paper
XYXian YangXCXiulian ChiCJChengjun Ji

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract. Concentrations of leaf nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are two key traits of plants for ecosystem functioning and dynamics. Foliar stoichiometry varies remarkably among life forms. However, previous studies have focused on the stoichiometric patterns of trees and grasses, leaving a significant knowledge gap for shrubs. In this study, we explored the intraspecific and interspecific variations of leaf N and P concentrations in response to the changes in climate, soil property, and evolutionary history. We analysed 1486 samples composed of 163 shrub species from 361 shrubland sites in northern China encompassing 46.1° (86.7–132.8° E) in longitude and 19.8° (32.6–52.4° N) in latitude. Leaf N concentrations decreased with precipitation, while leaf P concentrations decreased with temperature and increased with precipitation and soil total P concentrations. Both leaf N and P concentrations were phylogenetically conserved, but leaf P concentrations were less conserved than leaf N concentrations. At the community level, climate explained more interspecific variation of leaf nutrient concentrations, while soil nutrients explained most of the intraspecific variation. These results suggested that leaf N and P concentrations responded to climate, soil, and phylogeny in different ways. Climate influenced the community chemical traits through the shift in species composition, whereas soil directly influenced the community chemical traits. New patterns were discovered using our observations on specific regions and vegetation types, which improved our knowledge of broad biogeographic patterns of leaf chemical traits.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0452a07f46ef82ba7e7532https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4429-2016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations of woody plants differ in responses to climate, soil and plant growth form2011 · 294 citations
  2. 2Patterns and regulation of mycorrhizal plant and fungal diversity1995 · 311 citations
  3. 3An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III2009 · 4,879 citations
  4. 4Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere2002 · 4,526 citations
  5. 5Phosphorus and Sulphur Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems2007 · 58 citations