PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 15, 2017Molecular Biology and Evolution234 citationsOpen Access

Contrasting Rates of Molecular Evolution and Patterns of Selection among Gymnosperms and Flowering Plants

View Full Paper
ATAmanda R. De La TorreZLZhen LiYPYves Van de Peer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The majority of variation in rates of molecular evolution among seed plants remains both unexplored and unexplained. Although some attention has been given to flowering plants, reports of molecular evolutionary rates for their sister plant clade (gymnosperms) are scarce, and to our knowledge differences in molecular evolution among seed plant clades have never been tested in a phylogenetic framework. Angiosperms and gymnosperms differ in a number of features, of which contrasting reproductive biology, life spans, and population sizes are the most prominent. The highly conserved morphology of gymnosperms evidenced by similarity of extant species to fossil records and the high levels of macrosynteny at the genomic level have led scientists to believe that gymnosperms are slow-evolving plants, although some studies have offered contradictory results. Here, we used 31,968 nucleotide sites obtained from orthologous genes across a wide taxonomic sampling that includes representatives of most conifers, cycads, ginkgo, and many angiosperms with a sequenced genome. Our results suggest that angiosperms and gymnosperms differ considerably in their rates of molecular evolution per unit time, with gymnosperm rates being, on average, seven times lower than angiosperm species. Longer generation times and larger genome sizes are some of the factors explaining the slow rates of molecular evolution found in gymnosperms. In contrast to their slow rates of molecular evolution, gymnosperms possess higher substitution rate ratios than angiosperm taxa. Finally, our study suggests stronger and more efficient purifying and diversifying selection in gymnosperm than in angiosperm species, probably in relation to larger effective population sizes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Torre et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0497ea85ad022aadde607dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx069
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Adaptive gradients and isolation-by-distance with postglacial migration in Picea sitchensis2007 · 148 citations
  2. 2A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference.2009 · 1,116 citations
  3. 3Genome-Wide Analysis Reveals Diverged Patterns of Codon Bias, Gene Expression, and Rates of Sequence Evolution in Picea Gene Families2015 · 71 citations
  4. 4Population size and the rate of evolution2013 · 471 citations
  5. 5Genome Wide Analyses Reveal Little Evidence for Adaptive Evolution in Many Plant Species2010 · 263 citations