PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 24, 2021Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology30 citations

Durability of mitral isthmus ablation with and without ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall

View Full Paper
MIMasayuki IshimuraMYMasashi YamamotoTHToshiharu Himi

Key Points

  • To assess the acute efficacy and long-term durability of mitral isthmus ablation performed with versus without adjunctive ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall.
  • Analyzed 560 patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing initial mitral isthmus (MI) ablation.

Structured PICO

Does ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall added to radiofrequency ablation improve mitral isthmus block durability and reduce arrhythmia recurrence compared to radiofrequency ablation alone in patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
560 patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing an initial mitral isthmus (MI) ablation
I
Intervention
Radiofrequency (RF) ablation combined with ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) using 5 ml anhydrous ethanol in advance of RF
C
Comparator
Radiofrequency (RF) ablation alone
O
Outcome
Bidirectional mitral isthmus (MI) blocksurrogate

Adding ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall to radiofrequency ablation for mitral isthmus lines does not significantly improve long-term line durability or reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence compared to radiofrequency ablation alone.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) effectively creates a linear ablation lesion in the mitral isthmus (MI). However, data on the long-term success rates of MI ablation is limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 560 patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent an initial MI ablation. Ablations were performed by only radiofrequency (RF) in 384 (RF group) or by RF and EIVOM in 176 (EIVOM/RF group) patients; 5 ml anhydrous ethanol was used to perform EIVOM in advance of RF. Following EIVOM, RF pulses were delivered to the lateral MI line. Bidirectional MI block was fully achieved in 353/384 (92%) (First 318, Re-do 35) patinents in the RF group and 171/176 (97%) (First 128, Re-do 43) patients in the EIVOM/RF group (p = .09 in the first, p = .10 in the re-do ablation cases). In cases with complete MI line block, recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia was observed in 130/353 (37%) patients in the RF group and in 64/171 (37%) patients in the EIVOM/RF group (log-rank p = .12 in the first, and p = .30 in the re-do ablation cases). Of the total 560 patients, 123 proceeded to the subsequent ablation session. Reconduction across MI line block was observed in 39/80 (49%) patients in the RF group and 25/43 (58%) patients in the EIVOM/RF group (p = .32). CONCLUSION: EIVOM effectively ensures MI line block; however, the reconduction rate was similar between the two groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ishimura et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04a9bcf25296fdf37660f7https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper