PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2004Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials315 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors

View Full Paper
AOAkira OgoseTHTetsuo HottaHKHiroyuki Kawashima

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Long-term results are reported in 23 patients and short-term results in 30 patients presenting with bone tumors treated by curettage or resection followed by implantation of hydroxyapatite (HA) or highly purified beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP), respectively. Mean follow-up was 97 and 26 months in cases involving HA implantation and beta-TCP implantation, respectively. Radiographs revealed HA incorporation into host bone in all but two cases; moreover, no obvious evidence of HA biodegradation was observed. A single patient exhibited late deformity following implantation of HA. All grafted beta-TCP was, at least partially, absorbed and replaced by newly formed bone. The mean period required for the disappearance of radiolucent zones between the ceramics and host bone was 17 weeks in HA and 9.7 weeks in beta-TCP. Highly purified beta-TCP appears to be advantageous relative to HA for surgical intervention in bone tumors consequent to the nature of remodeling and superior osteoconductivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ogose et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04f66d11dbc69d399d3cc9https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30136
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper