PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1967Circulation208 citations

Clinical Features and Prognosis in Dissecting Aneurysm of the Aorta

View Full Paper
JLJoseph LindsayJHJ. Willis Hurst

Key Result

Aortic dissection sparing the ascending aorta was associated with better survival (42.1% survived 6-69 months) compared to ascending aorta involvement, where no patients survived beyond 3 weeks.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=62)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

P
Population
62 patients with proven diagnosis of aortic dissection from a large general hospital over approximately 17 years.
O
Outcome
Initial and long-term survivalhard clinical

Aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta carries a dismal prognosis with no survival beyond 3 weeks, whereas distal dissections have better survival and distinct clinical features like marked systemic hypertension.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 42.1% vs 0%

Limitations

  • The available data do not allow any definite conclusions about the efficacy of any form of therapy of this disorder.
  • Available data do not allow definite conclusions about the efficacy of any form of therapy

Abstract

The records of 62 patients on whom the diagnosis of aortic dissection was proved are reviewed with particular attention to the clinical features and prognosis in each case. This was the consecutive experience of a large general hospital over approximately 17 years. The initial and long-term survival was far better in patients in whom the ascending aorta was spared by the disease process. No patients in whom such involvement was present were known to survive more than 3 weeks. Eight of 19 patients whose disease began distal to the arch of the aorta are known to have survived 6 to 69 months even though six of these eight were not operated on. Striking differences in the clinical findings of the two groups were also found. Aortic regurgitation, impairment of a radial or carotid pulse, neurological signs, and hypotension were rare in the group whose dissection began beyond the left subclavian artery. Marked systemic hypertension was frequently observed in this group, over a third having a diastolic pressure over 140 mm Hg and nearly two thirds over 120 mm Hg. Such hypertension was unusual when the ascending aorta was the origin of the disease. Despite the present study the available data do not allow any definite conclusions about the efficacy of any form of therapy of this disorder.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lindsay et al. (1967) conducted an observational in Aortic dissection (n=62). Dissection sparing the ascending aorta vs. Dissection involving the ascending aorta was evaluated on Survival. Aortic dissection sparing the ascending aorta was associated with better survival (42.1% survived 6-69 months) compared to ascending aorta involvement, where no patients survived beyond 3 weeks.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0500480a15aba660e45e90https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.35.5.880
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Problems in the Surgical Management of Acute Dissecting Aneurysm of the Aorta1956 · 49 citations
  2. 2Dissecting Aortic Aneurysms: The Role of Fenestration Procedures in Treatment1966 · 4 citations
  3. 3Treatment of dissecting aneurysms of the aorta without surgery1965 · 369 citations
  4. 4A NEW SIGN IN DISSECTING ANEURYSM OF AORTA1952 · 25 citations
  5. 5Acute dissecting aortic aneurysms.1963 · 88 citations