PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2006AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology86 citations

Contrasting inotropic responses to α1-adrenergic receptor stimulation in left versus right ventricular myocardium

View Full Paper
GWGuanying WangDMDiana T. McCloskeySTSally Turcato

Structured PICO

Does alpha-1-adrenergic receptor stimulation cause different inotropic responses in left versus right ventricular myocardium in adult mice?

P
Population
Cardiac trabeculae from the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) of adult mouse hearts
I
Intervention
Alpha-1-adrenergic receptor stimulation with phenylephrine (PE) or A-61603
C
Comparator
Comparison between LV and RV trabeculae responses
O
Outcome
Myocardial inotropic (contractile) responsesurrogate

Left and right ventricular myocardium exhibit fundamentally different inotropic responses to alpha-1-adrenergic receptor stimulation, driven by differential effects on myofilament function.

Abstract

The left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) have differing hemodynamics and embryological origins, but it is unclear whether they are regulated differently. In particular, no previous studies have directly compared the LV versus RV myocardial inotropic responses to alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1)-AR) stimulation. We compared alpha(1)-AR inotropy of cardiac trabeculae from the LV versus RV of adult mouse hearts. As previously reported, for mouse RV trabeculae, alpha(1)-AR stimulation with phenylephrine (PE) caused a triphasic contractile response with overall negative inotropy. In marked contrast, LV trabeculae had an overall positive inotropic response to PE. Stimulation of a single subtype (alpha(1A)-AR) with A-61603 also mediated contrasting LV/RV inotropy, suggesting differential activation of multiple alpha(1)-AR-subtypes was not involved. Contrasting LV/RV alpha(1)-AR inotropy was not abolished by inhibiting protein kinase C, suggesting differential activation of PKC isoforms was not involved. However, contrasting LV/RV alpha(1)-AR inotropic responses did involve different effects on myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity: submaximal force of skinned trabeculae was increased by PE pretreatment for LV but was decreased by PE for RV. For LV myocardium, alpha(1)-AR-induced net positive inotropy was abolished by the myosin light chain kinase inhibitor ML-9. This study suggests that LV and RV myocardium have fundamentally different inotropic responses to alpha(1)-AR stimulation, involving different effects on myofilament function and myosin light chain phosphorylation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a051118fba2ba61ab55fa7dhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00167.2006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac α1‐adrenoceptor densities in different mammalian species1992 · 83 citations
  2. 2Selective contractile dysfunction of left, not right, ventricular myocardium in the SHHF rat2003 · 18 citations
  3. 3Protein kinase C enhances myosin light-chain kinase effects on force development and ATPase activity in rat single skinned cardiac cells1992 · 85 citations
  4. 4α-Adrenoceptor stimulation-mediated negative inotropism and enhanced Na+/Ca2+exchange in mouse ventricle2001 · 37 citations
  5. 5α1-AR-induced positive inotropic response in heart is dependent on myosin light chain phosphorylation2002 · 60 citations