PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2012Archives of Medical Science14 citationsOpen Access

Risk factor reduction in progression of angiographic coronary artery disease

HLHoang M. LaiWAWilbert S. AronowAMAnthony D. Mercando

Key Result

Patients with progressive coronary artery disease had significantly higher mean arterial blood pressure (97 vs 92 mm Hg) compared to patients with nonprogressive disease.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=183)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Are differences in blood pressure, LDL-C, and other risk factors associated with the progression of angiographic coronary artery disease?

P
Population
n=183 outpatients in an academic cardiology practice (New York, USA) who had ≥2 coronary angiographies ≥1 year apart. Mean age 71 years. Key inclusion: actively treated in the cardiology practice, receiving two or more cardiac catheterizations with coronary angiography at least 1 year apart.
I
Intervention
Risk factor profile (blood pressure, LDL-C, comorbidities, and medication use) in patients with progressive CAD
C
Comparator
Risk factor profile in patients with nonprogressive CAD
O
Outcome
Progression of CAD (defined as new non-obstructive or obstructive CAD in a previously disease-free vessel, or new obstruction in a previously non-obstructive vessel) measured by coronary angiographysurrogate

Higher mean arterial pressure and diastolic blood pressure are associated with angiographic progression of coronary artery disease, highlighting the importance of strict blood pressure control.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 97% vs 92%

p-value: p=0.01

Limitations

  • Retrospective study design
  • Long time gap between the two coronary angiographies may have contributed to the progression of CAD

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate differences between outpatients with progressive and nonprogressive coronary artery disease (CAD) measured by coronary angiography. Material and methods: Chart reviews were performed in patients in an outpatient cardiology practice having 2 coronary angiographies 1 year apart. Progressive CAD was defined as 1) new non-obstructive or obstructive CAD in a previously disease-free vessel; or 2) new obstruction in a previously non-obstructive vessel. Coronary risk factors, comorbidities, cardiovascular events, medication use, serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and blood pressure were used for analysis. Results: The study included 183 patients, mean age 71 years. Mean follow-up duration was 11 years. Mean follow-up between coronary angiographies was 58 months. Of 183 patients, 108 (59%) had progressive CAD, and 75 (41%) had nonprogressive CAD. The use of statins, -blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and aspirin was not significantly different in patient with progressive CAD or nonprogressive CAD Mean arterial pressure was higher in patients with progressive CAD than in patients with nonprogressive CAD (97 13 mm Hg vs. 92 12 mm Hg) (p < 0.05). Serum LDL-C was insignificantly higher in patients with progressive CAD (94 40 mg/dl) than in patients with nonprogressive CAD (81 34 mg/dl) (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Our data suggest that in addition to using appropriate medical therapy, control of blood pressure and serum LDL-C level may reduce progression of CAD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lai et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=183). Progressive CAD vs. Nonprogressive CAD was evaluated on Mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg) (p=0.01). Patients with progressive coronary artery disease had significantly higher mean arterial blood pressure (97 vs 92 mm Hg) compared to patients with nonprogressive disease.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05115efba2ba61ab55faf9https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2012.29520
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper