PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 9, 1992New England Journal of Medicine1,557 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of High Doses of Calcium-Channel Blockers on Survival in Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

View Full Paper
SRStuart RichEKElizabeth KaufmannPLP. S. Levy

Key Result

High-dose calcium-channel blockers improved 5-year survival in primary pulmonary hypertension patients who responded to acute vasodilator challenge compared to non-responders (94% vs 55%, P=0.003).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=64)

Structured PICO

Do high doses of calcium-channel blockers improve survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension who respond to acute vasodilator challenge?

P
Population
64 patients with primary pulmonary hypertension
I
Intervention
High doses of calcium-channel blockers (nifedipine mean 172 +/- 41 mg/day or diltiazem mean 720 +/- 208 mg/day) for up to five years in patients who responded to acute vasodilator challenge (defined as >20% fall in pulmonary-artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance)
C
Comparator
Patients who did not respond to acute vasodilator challenge, and patients enrolled in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Registry on Primary Pulmonary Hypertension
O
Outcome
Survival over a five-year periodhard clinical

High doses of calcium-channel blockers significantly improve 5-year survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension who demonstrate acute vasoreactivity.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 94% vs 55%

p-value: p=0.003

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary pulmonary hypertension is a progressive, fatal disease of unknown cause. Vasodilator drugs have been used as a treatment, but their efficacy is uncertain. METHODS: We treated 64 patients with primary pulmonary hypertension with high doses of calcium-channel blockers. Patients who responded to treatment (defined as those whose pulmonary-artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance immediately fell by more than 20 percent after challenge) were treated for up to five years. Their survival was compared with that of the patients who did not respond and with patients enrolled in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Registry on Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. Warfarin was given to 55 percent of the patients as concurrent therapy, on the basis of a lung scan showing nonuniformity of pulmonary blood flow (47 percent of patients who responded and 57 percent of those who did not respond). RESULTS: Seventeen patients (26 percent) responded to treatment, as indicated by a 39 percent fall in pulmonary-artery pressure and a 53 percent fall in the pulmonary-vascular-resistance index (P less than 0.001). Nifedipine (mean +/- SD daily dose, 172 +/- 41 mg) was given to 13 patients, and diltiazem (mean daily dose, 720 +/- 208 mg) was given to 4 patients. After five years, 94 percent of the patients who responded (16 of 17) were alive, as compared with 55 percent of the patients who did not respond (26 of 47, P = 0.003). The survival of the patients who responded was also significantly better than that of the NIH registry cohort (P = 0.002) and patients from the NIH registry who were treated at the University of Illinois (P = 0.001). The use of warfarin was associated with improved survival (P = 0.025), particularly in the patients who did not respond. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that high doses of calcium-channel blockers in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension who respond with reductions in pulmonary-artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance may improve survival over a five-year period.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rich et al. (1992) conducted a cohort in Primary pulmonary hypertension (n=64). High doses of calcium-channel blockers (nifedipine or diltiazem) vs. Non-responders and NIH Registry patients was evaluated on Survival at 5 years (p=0.003). High-dose calcium-channel blockers improved 5-year survival in primary pulmonary hypertension patients who responded to acute vasodilator challenge compared to non-responders (94% vs 55%, P=0.003).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a051212fba2ba61ab55fc3ehttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199207093270203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper