PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science0 citationsOpen Access

Phase-Specific Training in Eumenorrheic Women: The Role of Menstrual Cycle Hormonal Variability in Performance and Adaptation: A Literature Review

WTWeronika TrynkiewiczMSMonika StępińskaMOMarta Omiecińska

Key Points

  • This review evaluates how different phases of the menstrual cycle affect exercise performance and training adaptations in eumenorrheic women.
  • Conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus from 2005 to 2025.
  • Focused on original research and systematic reviews concerning eumenorrheic athletes.
  • Emphasized studies that utilized biochemical phase verification to assess menstrual cycles.
  • Aerobic capacity (VO2max) and running economy remained stable throughout the menstrual cycle.
  • Follicular-phase resistance training may yield higher strength gains in some but not all cohorts.
  • Athletes often report performance declines during the late luteal phase due to symptoms, despite stable physiological capacity.

Abstract

Background: The menstrual cycle is a fundamental physiological rhythm in eumenorrheic women, driven by fluctuations in estrogen and progesterone. While these hormones influence substrate metabolism and thermoregulation, their actual impact on athletic performance remains debated. Aim: This narrative review aims to evaluate the effects of menstrual cycle phases on acute exercise performance and chronic training adaptations, and to provide evidence-based practical recommendations. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases, covering original research and systematic reviews published between 2005 and 2025. Analysis focused on eumenorrheic athletes with a particular emphasis on studies utilizing biochemical phase verification. Results: Aerobic capacity (VO2max) and running economy remain stable across the cycle. While follicular-phase resistance training may offer superior strength gains in some cohorts, the broader evidence is inconsistent. A significant disconnect exists between physiological capacity and subjective perception, with athletes reporting performance decrements during the late luteal phase due to cycle-related symptoms. Conclusions: Current evidence does not support the universal application of rigid, phase-based training models for eumenorrheic athletes. The high inter-individual variability in cycle characteristics and symptom severity suggests that a generalized approach is insufficient. Instead, practitioners are encouraged to adopt an individualized "symptom-based" monitoring strategy, adjusting training loads in response to specific athlete feedback rather than presumed physiological shifts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trynkiewicz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05659da550a87e60a1df83https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(50).2026.5248
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper