PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Language Attitudes and Language Use among Linguistically Diverse Young Urban People in Sheger City

GYGutema YadesaAMAbebayehu Messele

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine the relationship between language attitudes and language usage among linguistically diverse young people.
  • Descriptive cross-sectional survey design involving 151 young urban students
  • Combination of quantitative methods (questionnaires, SPSS analysis) and qualitative methods (thematic analysis of interviews)
  • Inclusion of secondary data sources for a comprehensive understanding
  • Language attitudes among Amharic and Afan Oromo users were psychologically convergent but linguistically divergent in formal contexts.
  • Participants showed ambivalence towards Afan Oromo and convergent attitudes towards Amharic, perceiving Amharic mainly as a communication language.
  • Recommendations for bilingual and multilingual policies to promote positive language attitudes and reduce divisiveness were highlighted.

Abstract

The diverse languages of the host community and the metropolitan city are often hostile and possibly influence one another's usage. This study was intended to explore if and how language attitudes could influence language usage among linguistically diverse first language (L1) users. The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional survey design that involved a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches that included questionnaires, interviews, and secondary sources. Data were collected from 151 young urban students with diverse linguistic backgrounds. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS and descriptive tools, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. The results revealed that the language attitudes of both Amharic and Afan Oromo L1 users were more convergent and less divergent psychologically; however, they were more divergent linguistically in formal domains. The neutrality towards Afan Oromo usage meant the participants were psychologically ambivalent and linguistically divergent, whereas the neutrality towards Amharic was psychologically ambivalent and linguistically convergent. Moreover, Amharic was primarily perceived as a language used for communication purposes, whereas Afan Oromo is a language of identity marker among respective L1 users. This phenomenon may be attributed to the limited usage of Afan Oromo as a lingua franca among second-language learners. Thus, the results have policy implications to reduce the divisiveness of languages and nurture positive attitudes toward one's and others' linguistic behavior. A bilingual language policy in major urban areas that may serve the needs of the communities surrounding those areas and a multilingual language policy at the country level were suggested.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yadesa et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0566bda550a87e60a1ea4ahttps://doi.org/10.20372/eajssh.v9i1.710
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper