PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Geophysical Research Letters2 citationsOpen Access

Hydrologic Whiplash in the Mississippi River Basin: Mechanisms and Projections

View Full Paper
MOMichelle O’DonnellSDSylvia DeeJDJames Doss‐Gollin

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the mechanisms driving hydrologic whiplash in the Mississippi River Basin and its future projections.
  • Utilized observations and the CESM2‐LENS model to assess historic whiplash occurrences
  • Analyzed changes in whiplash frequency through the 21st century under the SSP3‐7.0 scenario
  • Identified mechanisms distinguishing whiplash events from singular events
  • Whiplash events are projected to increase on western tributaries, with rises of 115% for Missouri and 137% for Arkansas.
  • Antecedent precipitation and snowmelt initiate whiplash events, whereas soil moisture anomalies can differ from singular event patterns.

Abstract

Abstract Volatility and unpredictability of hydroclimate systems stresses planning and risk management. Notably, the rapid transition between periods of high and low streamflow, known as hydrologic whiplash, is gaining attention worldwide. Yet the specific mechanisms driving hydrologic whiplash events, and how they differ from singular events, remain poorly understood. We examine whiplash within the Mississippi River basin using observations and the Community Earth System Model version 2 Large Ensemble (CESM2‐LENS) to quantify historic occurrence on major tributaries and changes in frequency through the 21st century under a moderately high emissions scenario (SSP3‐7.0), and identify hydrologic mechanisms distinguishing these events from isolated events. We find that whiplash events increase in frequency most notably on western tributaries (Missouri, +115% and Arkansas, +137%), and that antecedent precipitation and snowmelt pulses or deficits initiate these whiplash events, while soil moisture anomalies can have opposite signs from those associated with singular events.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

O’Donnell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0566bda550a87e60a1eb4fhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2026gl122807
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper