PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Neuro-Oncology Advances2 citationsOpen Access

Surgical resection or bevacizumab for treatment of radiation necrosis-associated cerebral edema in patients with brain metastases: a single center experience

View Full Paper
MDMiles E. DijkstraJSJoost W. SchoutenLPLotte Plegt

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the effectiveness of surgical resection versus bevacizumab for treating cerebral edema caused by radiation necrosis in patients with brain metastases.
  • Retrospective cohort study at a single center, including patients >18 years old with confirmed radiation necrosis.
  • Data extracted from electronic health records of patients receiving surgical resection or bevacizumab after stereotactic radiotherapy.
  • Primary outcomes assessed included dexamethasone usage, post-treatment edema volume, and rates of adverse events.
  • Surgical resection resulted in a higher rate of dexamethasone discontinuation (81.0% vs 46.7%, P < .0001).
  • Lower incidence of grade 2 or higher adverse events was observed with surgical resection (3.2% vs 43.8%).
  • Overall survival was similar between both treatment groups.

Abstract

Abstract Background Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN) is a frequent adverse event of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases. This retrospective, single-center cohort study compares surgical resection with bevacizumab for the management of RN-associated cerebral edema in patients with brain metastases following stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods Data were extracted from the electronic health records of patients 18 years old that were operated or received bevacizumab for metastatic cerebral RN at Erasmus MC. Inclusion criteria were histopathologically confirmed or a clinical and radiological diagnosis of cerebral RN. Primary outcomes included dexamethasone usage, post-treatment edema volume, and adverse event rates. Results Among 62 patients treated with resection and 32 with bevacizumab, both interventions resulted in significant reductions in cerebral edema and dexamethasone usage. Surgical resection resulted in a higher rate of dexamethasone discontinuation (81.0% vs 46.7%, P .0001) and a lower incidence of grade 2 or higher adverse events (3.2% vs 43.8%) than bevacizumab. Overall survival did not differ between groups. Conclusions Surgical resection can serve as a principal therapeutic strategy for RN-associated cerebral edema in appropriately selected cases where procedural risk is deemed acceptable. Prospective studies are warranted to refine criteria for patient selection and to optimize management strategies for RN occurring in the context of brain metastases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dijkstra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05677ca550a87e60a1f892https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdag120
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper