PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026European journal of medical research0 citationsOpen Access

Exploring the prognostic value of the FIRST simplified frailty scale in elderly, transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients in real-world settings

YZYue ZhouJQJiaQi QinXSXiaoJing Shi

Key Points

  • To evaluate the prognostic value of the FIRST simplified frailty scale in elderly multiple myeloma patients ineligible for autologous transplantation.
  • Retrospective review of clinical records of 43 consecutive MM patients aged over 65 years
  • Frailty assessed using the FIRST simplified scale, classifying patients as frail or not frail
  • Comparison of treatment efficacy, adverse events, and survival outcomes between frail and not frail groups.
  • Overall response rate (ORR) was 96.6% in frail vs 100% in non-frail patients (P > 0.05)
  • Frail patients had a lower rate of achieving very good partial response (58.6% vs 92.9%; P < 0.05)
  • Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months for frail vs 25.5 months for not frail (P < 0.05) and median overall survival (OS) was 17 months vs 34.7 months (P < 0.05).

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of the FIRST simplified frailty scale in a real-world cohort of elderly (age > 65 years), newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients ineligible for autologous transplantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 43 consecutive MM patients aged over 65 years treated at our center between January 2016 and December 2023. Frailty was determined using the FIRST simplified scale, classifying patients as frail (n = 29) or not frail (n = 14). We compared treatment efficacy, treatment-related adverse events and survival outcomes between the two groups. Results The ORR was 96.6% in the frail group and 100% in the not frail group ( P > 0.05 ). The proportion of frail patients achieving VGPR or better was significantly lower than that of not frail patients (58.6% vs 92.9%; P < 0.05 ). Incidences of hematological and non-hematological adverse events were similar in both groups. Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was 12 months in frail patients versus 25.5 months in not frail patients ( P < 0.05 ), and median Overall Survival (OS) was 17 months versus 34.7 months, respectively ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion Elderly MM patients experience higher rates of treatment-related adverse events and worse survival than younger counterparts, and the FIRST simplified frailty scale offers a practical, valuable tool for risk stratification in this population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0567bca550a87e60a1fe11https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04603-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multiple Myeloma in the Older Adult: Better Prospects, More Challenges2014 · 93 citations
  2. 2Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma2021 · 134 citations
  3. 3Limiting early mortality: Do's and don'ts in the management of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma2015 · 20 citations
  4. 4Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial2016 · 905 citations
  5. 5Real-world results of autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a report from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group database2023 · 26 citations