PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

A cross-linguistic corpus acoustic analysis of rhotics

View Full Paper
JMJanalyn A. MiklasMKMatthew C. Kelley

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the pronunciation variations of rhotic sounds in different languages.
  • Cross-linguistic corpus analysis of rhotics using data from the Mozilla Common Voice corpus.
  • Comparison includes languages such as Turkish, Uzbek, Kazakh, Farsi, Russian, Romanian, Macedonian, Czech, Irish, and Mexican Spanish.
  • Examination of spectral differences of word-final rhotic variants across the selected languages.
  • Documented variations include fricated alveolar taps in Turkish and Uzbek.
  • Identified dentalized alveolar trills and voiced uvular fricatives in Kazakh, among others.
  • Highlighted a variety of rhotic pronunciations across languages, demonstrating the diversity in rhotic sound production.

Abstract

Cross-linguistically, rhotics exhibits a wide range of pronunciation variation, especially word-finally. The languages compared in this study include Turkish, Uzbek, Kazakh, Farsi, Russian, Romanian, Macedonian, Czech, Irish, and Mexican Spanish, which all have been described as having a fricative-like variant of their rhotic(s). Previous research has reported a word-final devoiced and fricated alveolar tap for Turkish and Uzbek; dentalized alveolar trill and voiced uvular fricative for Kazakh; alveolar trill, approximant, and tap which may be fricated word-finally for Farsi; alveolar and palatalized trill for Russian and Romanian; alveolar trill for Macedonian; alveolar trill with a fricated variant for Czech; palatalized tap which may be fricated for Irish; and alveolar tap with a fricated variant for Mexican Spanish. The data used for this cross-linguistic corpus study is from the Mozilla Common Voice corpus. This exploratory analysis will examine spectral differences within and across languages for each rhotic. The results of this study aim to assess the range of descriptions used for rhotics and their variants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miklas et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05684ea550a87e60a20d0bhttps://doi.org/10.1121/10.0041461
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper