PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

Effects of speech intelligibility in ecological noise on contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions

View Full Paper
SLSinyoung LeeKKKen Kiyono

Key Points

  • Evaluate the relationship between contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions and speech perception in noisy environments.
  • Used ecological noise and recorded speech as stimuli for contralateral suppression assessment.
  • Investigated the influence of selective attention by processing speech to unintelligible forms.
  • Analyzed frequency characteristics of stimuli in relation to suppression magnitude.
  • Suppression magnitude was primarily influenced by frequency characteristics of stimuli rather than overall sound pressure level.
  • Subjects with normal hearing demonstrated variability in speech comprehension in noise settings.
  • Findings suggest potential for new assessment tools for those with speech understanding difficulties despite normal hearing.

Abstract

Some individuals experience difficulty understanding speech, especially in noisy environments, despite having normal hearing thresholds in audiometry. The ability to selectively focus on a particular sound in such environments is believed to be mediated by the cochlear efferent system, specifically the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR). To non-invasively evaluate MOCR, contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions (CSOAEs) has been studied. OAEs are sounds generated by the active cochlea and emitted toward the ear canal. However, most previous studies used artificial stimuli (e.g., white or pink noise) as contralateral stimuli and have largely overlooked the effects of selective attention. In this study, the relationship between CSOAE and speech perception in noise was investigated using more ecologically valid contralateral stimuli, such as recorded speech (e.g., newspaper reading) combined with everyday background noise (e.g., dishwashing sounds). Influences of selective attention were also investigated by processing the voice to unintelligible. Results showed that the magnitude of suppression was influenced more by the frequency characteristics of the contralateral stimuli than by their overall sound pressure level (dB LAeq). These findings may contribute to the development of improved assessment tools for individuals with normal hearing but difficulties in speech comprehension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05684ea550a87e60a20d19https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0040787
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Attention to speech modulates distortion product otoacoustic emissions evoked by speech-derived stimuli in humans2026
  2. 2Effect of square wave contralateral stimulation on distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression: Contribution of frequency components2025
  3. 3Effects of contralateral noise on envelope-following responses, auditory-nerve compound action potentials, and otoacoustic emissions measured simultaneously2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Attention to Speech Modulates Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions Evoked by Speech-derived Stimuli in Humans2025
  5. 5Short-term buildup of contralateral olivocochlear emission suppression and its effect on the words-in-noise test2025