PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

Creaky voice perception modulated by f0 and gender cues

View Full Paper
JBJeanne BrownMcGill UniversityMCMeghan ClayardsMcGill University

Key Points

  • This research examines how creaky voice perception is influenced by speaker gender and fundamental frequency (f0).
  • Matched-guise paradigm used with 40 Canadian English listeners rating modal and creaky voices.
  • Voices altered to possess ambiguously gendered formants and median f0 levels (115, 135, 155 Hz), paired with gendered faces.
  • Ratings gathered on a visual-analog scale for perceived creakiness.
  • Creaky and lower f0 voices received higher creakiness ratings according to Bayesian regression models.
  • No overall increase in creakiness ratings for female faces; weak interaction found between face gender and f0.
  • Slightly higher creakiness ratings for female faces at low f0 and male faces at high f0, indicating gender prototypicality effects.

Abstract

Creaky voice has traditionally been associated with men's speech (e.g., Henton Klatt Yuasa, 2010) have perpetuated increased creak use by women, typically implementing perceptual coding. This study investigates this mismatch by testing how creaky voice perception is modulated by (perceived) speaker gender and f0. Using a matched-guise paradigm, 40 Canadian English listeners rated modal and creaky voices—altered to have ambiguously gendered formants and median f0 (115,135, 155 Hz), and paired with female and male faces—for perceived creakiness along a visual-analog scale. Bayesian regression models showed robust effects of voice quality and moderate effects of f0: creaky and lower f0 stimuli rated as creakier. We found no evidence of female faces increasing creakiness ratings overall. However, a weak interaction between face gender and f0 suggests a possible gender prototypicality effect: creakiness ratings slightly higher for female faces at low f0 and for male faces at higher f0. These results indicate that reports of increased creak in women’s voices cannot be explained by social gender bias or acoustic bias alone.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brown et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05685ca550a87e60a20da8https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0041290
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of speaker gender on attitudes towards creaky voice in US English2025
  2. 2Reconsidering Listener Evaluations of Creaky Voice2026
  3. 3Understanding voice quality variation by attending to multiple phonetic dimensions: The rise of creaky voice in California2026
  4. 4Social perception of creaky voice in Mandarin Chinese: everyone’s gender matters2026
  5. 5Gender effects in Mandarin creaky voice evaluation: a matched-guise study2025