PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 1983New England Journal of Medicine305 citations

A Double-Blind Trial of Metoprolol in Acute Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper
LRL RydénRARomeo AriniegoKAKrister Arnman

Key Result

Metoprolol significantly reduced the incidence of ventricular fibrillation compared to placebo in patients with acute myocardial infarction (0.86% vs 2.44%; P<0.05).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=1,395)

Blinding

Double-blind

Structured PICO

Does metoprolol reduce the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
n=1395 patients with suspected myocardial infarction (809 developed definite acute myocardial infarction, 162 probable infarction)
I
Intervention
Metoprolol 15 mg intravenously as soon as possible after admission, followed by 200 mg daily for three months
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (including premature ventricular contractions, short bursts of ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation)hard clinical

Early administration of metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction provides a prophylactic effect against ventricular fibrillation and reduces the need for antiarrhythmic therapy with lidocaine.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.86% vs 2.44%

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

During a double-blind trial in which patients with suspected myocardial infarction received metoprolol or placebo, we analyzed the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Metoprolol (15 mg intravenously) was given as soon as possible after admission, and thereafter 200 mg was given daily for three months. Antiarrhythmic drugs were given only for ventricular fibrillation and sustained ventricular tachycardia (greater than 60 beats per second). Definite acute myocardial infarction developed in 809 of the 1395 participants, and probable infarction in 162. Metoprolol did not influence the occurrence of premature ventricular contractions or short bursts of ventricular tachycardia. However, there were 17 cases of ventricular fibrillation in the placebo group (697 patients) and only 6 in the metoprolol group (698 patients, P less than 0.05). During the hospital stay significantly fewer patients receiving metoprolol (16) than placebo (38) (P less than 0.01) required lidocaine. In a separate analysis of 145 patients, metoprolol did not influence the occurrence of premature ventricular contractions or short bursts of ventricular tachycardia during the first 24 hours of treatment. Despite a lack of effect on less serious ventricular tachyarrhythmias, metoprolol had a prophylactic effect against ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rydén et al. (1983) conducted an RCT in suspected myocardial infarction (n=1,395). Metoprolol vs. Placebo was evaluated on ventricular fibrillation (p=<0.05). Metoprolol significantly reduced the incidence of ventricular fibrillation compared to placebo in patients with acute myocardial infarction (0.86% vs 2.44%; P<0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a066421cc83fae861778436https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198303173081102
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper