PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Frontiers in Sports and Active Living0 citationsOpen Access

From guesswork to guidance: a delphi study on practices of talent identification and development in Para athletics

ACAnnmarie CarrollAOAlison O’RiordanKPKate Pumpa

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine best practices in talent identification and development in Para athletics. It seeks to gather expert insights and reach consensus on effective strategies.
  • Three-round Delphi survey with experts in Para athletics talent identification
  • Round One gathered insights through open-ended questions, followed by thematic analysis
  • Rounds Two and Three refined statements based on expert consensus regarding talent identification and development practices.
  • Nine of 20 statements reached consensus in Round Two regarding talent identification practices.
  • Seven of 14 statements reached consensus in Round Three focusing on development strategies.
  • Key strategies included quantitative performance assessments and individual athlete development plans.

Abstract

Objectives To determine best practices in Para athletics talent identification and development through a Delphi survey. Methods A three round Delphi survey was conducted with experts in Para athletics talent identification and development. Round One aimed to elicit insights into the current practices and beliefs in talent identification and development in Para athletics using open ended questions. Round One survey responses were analysed and collated into statements which formulated Round Two, where respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with these statements. Where consensus was reached (i.e., an agreement level of 75%) no further questions were asked regarding the topic of that statement. Where consensus was not achieved, the statements were revised and carried forward to Round Three. Respondents were required to, again, rate their level of agreement with these statements. Results A total of 23 experts completed three survey rounds (Round One, n = 31; Round Two, n = 24; Round Three n = 23). Thematic analysis of Round One identified themes such as quantitative assessment, coaching approaches, and physical and psychological attributes of athletes. Of 20 statements in Round Two, nine reached consensus. Of 14 statements in Round Three, seven reached consensus. Conclusion Consensus was reached on key talent identification and development strategies including quantitative performance assessments, individualised athlete development plans and high levels of coaching experience and expertise. Together, these approaches contribute to a more structured and evidence-based pathway for athlete progression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carroll et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b74ce7dec685947aa381https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1791259
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Explaining international sporting success: An international comparison of elite sport systems and policies in six countries2009 · 260 citations
  2. 2Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research2017 · 2,273 citations
  3. 3World-Class Sprinters’ Careers: Early Success Does Not Guarantee Success at Adult Age2020 · 53 citations
  4. 4Standards of Conditions During Preparations for the Summer Paralympic Games Between 2004 and 2012 Assessed by Polish Athletes2015 · 9 citations
  5. 5Comparing Burnout in Sport-Specializing Versus Sport-Sampling Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis2020 · 63 citations