PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Revista portuguesa de musicologia0 citationsOpen Access

Whose voices are heard in music curriculum development? A comparative Study of Germany, Ireland and Lithuania

KSKarla Louisa StolleRGRūta GirdzijauskienėLOLorraine O'Connell

Key Points

  • This article explores the influence of various stakeholders in music curriculum development across Germany, Ireland, and Lithuania.
  • Document analysis of national music curricula from Germany, Ireland, and Lithuania
  • Comparative policy review to assess stakeholder involvement and decision-making structures
  • Investigate the historical development and processes of music curriculum design in each country.
  • All three countries utilize expert-led curriculum design focused on competency-based outcomes.
  • Ireland has the most consultative model for stakeholder participation, while Germany's system is fragmented due to federal governance.
  • Lithuania's music curriculum development is characterized by strong central coordination, though gaps in stakeholder influence persist.

Abstract

This article explores whose voices shape music curriculum development in Germany, Ireland, and Lithuania. Drawing on document analysis and comparative policy review, it investigates whose voices are recognised, consulted, or silenced in national music-curriculum-making. Curriculum development in each country is examined through three interconnected lenses: historical development, the processes of music curriculum design, and the structures of decision-making, while also considering how stakeholder voices are represented or marginalised within these frameworks. Findings show that all three systems rely on expert-led curriculum design framed by competency-based outcomes, yet differ in how they structure participation. Ireland employs the most open consultative model, Germany reflects fragmented federal governance, and Lithuania maintains strong central coordination. The study highlights persistent gaps between policy rhetoric and meaningful stakeholder influence in music curriculum development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stolle et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b81ce7dec685947aaa33https://doi.org/10.25659/rpem.v152i.64
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Power and policy: Unpacking hegemonic narratives in music education2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Analysis of Music Curricula and Creative Content i n Textbooks f or Lower Elementary Education: The Cases of the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan2025
  3. 3Accessing musical and curriculum literacies: historical echoes for music teacher practices in the English secondary school2026
  4. 4Rethinking the music curriculum theories: Towards an updated comprehensive student-centred approach2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Integrating German Art Song into Vocal Pedagogy: A Comparative Review of Curriculum and Cultural Contexts in Germany and South Africa2025 · 1 citations