PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology3 citations

The Spinal Muscular Atrophy Functional Classification System

View Full Paper
JHJason J. HowardHGH. Kerr GrahamMSM. Wade Shrader

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a classification for functional mobility in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) that reflects changes due to treatment.
  • Included patients with SMA who underwent Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) assessments.
  • Constructed the Spinal Muscular Atrophy Functional Classification System (SMAFCS) with levels I to IV.
  • Performed receiver-operating characteristic analysis to identify HFMSE thresholds correlated with SMAFCS levels.
  • Sixty patients (62% female) had 312 HFMSE assessments over an average of 7.5 years.
  • HFMSE thresholds for SMAFCS levels were established, showing significant age trajectories for levels I, III, and IV.
  • As SMAFCS level increased, there was a clear decline in pulmonary function, with significant p-values indicating severity.

Abstract

AIM: To develop a functional mobility classification for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), reflecting changing phenotypes in the era of disease-modifying agents, with associations to hip displacement, scoliosis, and pulmonary function determined. METHOD: Patients with SMA and Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) assessments were included. The Spinal Muscular Atrophy Functional Classification System (SMAFCS), comprising levels I to IV, was constructed, referencing Functional Mobility Scale groupings. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis determined HFMSE thresholds by SMAFCS. Associations of hip displacement, scoliosis, and pulmonary function were determined. RESULTS: Sixty patients (62% female) were included, with 312 HFMSE assessments (mean 5.3 SD 2.7 per patient) over 7 years 6 months (SD 3 years 11 months). HFMSE thresholds by SMAFCS level were I, ≥27; II, ≥22, <27; III, ≥10, <22; IV, <10 (area under the curve 0.62-0.89; p < 0.001). HFMSE versus SMAFCS age trajectories were modeled, significant for levels I (p = 0.002), III (p < 0.001), and IV (p = 0.002) but not level II (p = 0.48). The prevalences of hip displacement and scoliosis by SMAFCS level were respectively I, 61%; II, 50%; III, 92%; IV, 96% (p = 0.008) and I, 42%; II, 50%; III, 85%; IV, 96% (p < 0.001). Pulmonary function (forced vital capacity percent of predicted) worsened by SMAFCS level: I, 96 (SD 15); II, 83 (SD 12); III, 75 (SD 16); IV, 48 (SD 27) (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: These preliminary data suggest the SMAFCS could be a valuable tool to stratify gross motor function and predict risk of clinical outcomes in SMA. Further work is required to study reliability and responsiveness to change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Howard et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b888e7dec685947aaf3ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.70307
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper