PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Journal of Research in Medical Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Nursing interventions including psychological support and quality of life determinants in patients with dysphagia following stroke

View Full Paper
ALAihua LiuLXLiu XuehongPZPing Zhou

Key Points

  • This review evaluates the effectiveness of nursing interventions that include psychological support on the quality of life in patients experiencing dysphagia post-stroke.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Included randomized controlled trials assessing nursing interventions with psychological components related to dysphagia and quality of life outcomes.
  • Subgroup analyses were performed based on intervention duration and type, involving a total of 693 participants across nine RCTs.
  • Nursing interventions improved quality of life compared to control conditions (SMD = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.48–1.41; P <0.001).
  • Short interventions (≤4 weeks) were more effective (SMD = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.13–2.29) than longer ones (>4 weeks, SMD = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.32–1.31).
  • Psychological-only interventions resulted in greater improvement (SMD = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.68–1.82) compared to combined approaches (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.20–1.43).

Abstract

Background: Poststroke dysphagia (PSD) affects nearly half of stroke survivors and impairs health-related quality of life. Nursing interventions increasingly integrate psychological support, yet their effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of nursing strategies incorporating psychological support on QOL in PSD patients and examined the influence of intervention duration and type. Materials and Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched up to August 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing nursing interventions with psychological components, such as counseling or education, cognitive behavioral therapy-informed strategies, relaxation or stress management, emotional support, and motivational interviewing, and reporting QOL outcomes were included. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses compared short (≤4 weeks) versus longer (>4 weeks) interventions and psychological-only versus combined approaches. Results: Nine RCTs involving 693 participants were included. Nursing interventions improved QOL compared with control conditions (SMD = 0.95; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.48–1.41; P <0.001), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 84.5%). Interventions lasting ≤4 weeks showed larger effects (SMD = 1.21; 95% CI: 0.13–2.29) than longer interventions (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.32–1.31). Psychological-only interventions produced greater benefits (SMD = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.68–1.82) than combined approaches (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.20–1.43). No publication bias was detected (Egger’s test, P = 0.79). Conclusion: Nursing interventions incorporating psychological support enhance QOL in PSD. Short-duration and psychological-only approaches appear most effective, supporting integration into stroke rehabilitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b928e7dec685947abbe5https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_1233_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper