PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Ocular VEMP Using Bone Conduction Stimuli at the Forehead - A Pilot Study Comparing B250, Minishaker and Tendon Hammer with Vibrometry Validation

View Full Paper
BHBo HåkanssonKJKarl-Johan Fredén JanssonLVLuca Verrecchia

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare the effectiveness of different bone-conduction transducers in eliciting ocular VEMP responses.
  • Pilot study evaluating oVEMP responses using B250, Minishaker, and Tendon hammer transducers.
  • Measurements taken at forehead Fz/AFz with a 250 Hz sinus cycle.
  • Mastoid velocity assessed using laser Doppler vibrometry.
  • B250 and Minishaker produced dual oVEMP peaks with early n1 (mean latency: 8.8 ms) and late n2 responses (B250: 12.4 ms, Minishaker: 13.3 ms).
  • The Tendon hammer resulted in an intermediate response.
  • Laser Doppler vibrometry indicated multiple positive peaks for B250 and a single peak for the Minishaker.

Abstract

Background: Bone-conduction stimuli in oVEMP testing offer lower stimulus levels and independence of conductive hearing loss but lack a clinically suitable transducer for excitation. A new bone-conduction transducer (B250) has been developed which is easy to attach and can be directly connected to test stations. Objective: To compare, in a pilot investigation B250, Minishaker and Tendon hammer excitation, used for oVEMP and mastoid vibration measurements. Methods: oVEMPs in three subjects were measured using transducers driven by a 250 Hz condensation single sinus cycle and with a Tendon hammer, all applied at forehead Fz/AFz. Corresponding mastoid velocity was measured using a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV). Results: B250 and Minishaker often produced dual oVEMP peaks with an early n1 (mean latency: 8.8 ms) and a late n2 response (B250: 12.4/Minishaker: 13.3 ms), and with the Tendon hammer response in between. This finding was supported by a reinvestigation of a previous study (n=15). LDV velocity shows several positive peaks for B250 and one positive peak for the Minishaker. The acceleration response has two peaks 4 ms apart for both transducers, which seem to relate to the early and late oVEMP latencies. Conclusion: B250 may serve as a potential alternative, pending validation in larger samples, to the Minishaker at the forehead, but with care to polarity choice and latency interpretation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Håkansson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b998e7dec685947ac5efhttps://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-434110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper