PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Testable Planck-Suppressed Environmental Correction to Quantum Phase Evolution: Version 1.3, Experimental Sensitivity Forecast and Null-Test Bounds

View Full Paper
IIIsmail Ishagi

Key Points

  • This study aims to improve a quantum framework by incorporating a Planck-suppressed response term into phase evolution.
  • Introduced a unified residual-response variable and developed a modified Schrödinger equation.
  • Added experimental sensitivity forecasts and null-test bounds for the dimensionless coupling parameter eta_Q.
  • Derived bounds for linear and quadratic Planck suppression and analyzed environmental length scales.
  • Confidence intervals on eta_Q were established, predicting phase shifts in interferometric systems.
  • Sensitivity plot demonstrated how null measurements can constrain the proposed quantum model.
  • New version maintains compatibility with standard quantum mechanics under specific limits.

Abstract

This record archives Version 1. 3 of the TCVR-Q manuscript. TCVR-Q is formulated as a conservative effective quantum framework in which standard quantum mechanics is recovered in the zero-coupling limit, while a small Planck-suppressed residual-response term is added to quantum phase evolution. Version 1. 3 extends the previous formulation by adding an experimental sensitivity forecast and explicit null-test bounds on the dimensionless coupling parameter etaQ. The framework introduces a unified residual-response variable, XTCVR, whose projections appear as SCQR in coarse-grained astrophysical coronae and as SQ in controlled laboratory quantum systems. The modified Schrödinger equation contains a channel-dependent energy scale E_*, equivalently Omega₀ = E_*/hbar, and predicts a small path-dependent phase shift in interferometric systems. The new version derives representative bounds on etaQ for linear and quadratic Planck suppression, compares different environmental length scales, and includes a sensitivity plot showing how null phase-shift measurements can constrain the model. The framework does not claim a direct detection of TCVR, does not replace standard quantum mechanics, and does not assume observer-induced wavefunction collapse. It is presented as a phenomenological, Planck-suppressed residual-response parameterization compatible with standard quantum mechanics in the appropriate limit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ismail Ishagi (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b9e2e7dec685947ac90bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20151972
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper