PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 1999The Journal of Chemical Physics173 citations

The aurophilic attraction as interpreted by local correlation methods

View Full Paper
NRNino RunebergMSMartin SchützHWHans‐Joachim Werner

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The nature of the aurophilic interaction is studied by applying local second-order Mo/ller–Plesset perturbation theory (LMP2) on model dimers of X–Au–PH32 (X=H, Cl) type. The possibility to decompose the correlation contribution of the interaction energy in the dimer (A–B) into different excitation classes reveals that the dispersion contribution (A→A′,B→B′) is accompanied by an almost equally important ionic component (A→A′,B→A′), at shorter distances. Double excitations where at least one electron originates from the gold 5d orbitals account for almost 90% of the attraction. Relativistic effects amount to 28% of the binding energy and can be traced to arise almost exclusively from the relativistic expansion of gold d-shells.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Runeberg et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06beed05e809827fd3bf88https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478665
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper