PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 31, 2014Water Resources Research137 citations

Flood frequency analysis using radar rainfall fields and stochastic storm transposition

View Full Paper
DWDaniel B. WrightJSJames A. SmithMBMary Lynn Baeck

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Flooding is the product of complex interactions among spatially and temporally varying rainfall, heterogeneous land surface properties, and drainage network structure.Conventional approaches to flood frequency analysis rely on assumptions regarding these interactions across a range of scales.The impacts of these assumptions on flood risk estimates are poorly understood.In this study, we present an alternative flood frequency analysis framework based on stochastic storm transposition (SST).We use SST to synthesize long records of rainfall over the Charlotte, North Carolina, USA metropolitan area by ''reshuffling'' radar rainfall fields, within a probabilistic framework, from a 10 year (2001-2010) high-resolution (15 min, 1 km 2 ) radar data set.We use these resampled fields to drive a physics-based distributed hydrologic model for a heavily urbanized watershed in Charlotte.The approach makes it possible to estimate discharge return periods for all points along the drainage network without the assumptions regarding rainfall structure and its interactions with watershed features that are required using conventional methods.We develop discharge estimates for return periods from 10 to 1000 years for a range of watershed scales up to 110 km 2 .SST reveals that flood risk in the larger subwatersheds is dominated by tropical storms, while organized thunderstorm systems dominate flood risk in the smaller subwatersheds.We contrast these analyses with examples of potential problems that can arise from conventional frequency analysis approaches.SST provides an approach for examining the spatial extent of flooding and for incorporating nonstationarities in rainfall or land use into flood risk estimates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wright et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0733bb6b3d000707585addhttps://doi.org/10.1002/2013wr014224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The effect of land use/cover change on surface runoff in Shenzhen region, China2006 · 211 citations
  2. 2Dynamical Downscaling Projections of Twenty-First-Century Atlantic Hurricane Activity: CMIP3 and CMIP5 Model-Based Scenarios2014 · 4 citations
  3. 3Radar hydrology: rainfall estimation.2003 · 395 citations
  4. 4Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) User's Manual; Version 1.43 for Watershed Modeling System 6.12006 · 70 citations
  5. 5Simulated reduction in Atlantic hurricane frequency under twenty-first-century warming conditions2008 · 418 citations