PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2006Aggressive Behavior463 citations

Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: age trends, gender differences, and correlates

View Full Paper
HSHerbert ScheithauerTHTobias HayerFPFranz Petermann

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A revised version of the Bully/Victim Questionnaire Olweus, 1991 was given to 2,086 fifth–tenth grader students from schools in two German federal states. The results were analysed in terms of frequencies of self-reports of different forms of bullying (physical, verbal, relational/indirect; for bullies and for victims), gender and grade differences. Overall, 12.1% of the students reported bullying others and 11.1% reported being bullied (victimisation). We classified 2.3% of the students as bully/victims due to their self-report. Significantly more boys reported bullying others, regardless of bullying form, and significantly more boys than girls were classified as bully/victims. Although there was no gender difference for victimisation at all, boys reported significantly more often than girls being bullied physically. Besides, self-reports of pure and overlapping forms of bullying behaviour (relational, verbal, physical) were analysed. With regard to age trends, students from middle grades reported the highest rates of bullying. Self-reported rates of victimisation were higher for younger students, regardless of form of victimisation. Furthermore, class size was not linked to reports of bullying and victimisation. Results from logistic regression analyses emphasised that the variables “gender” and “grade” add significantly to the prediction of self-reported bullying; “grade” and variables measuring impaired psychosocial “well-being” of students at school (e.g., feeling of not being popular, negative attitude towards breaks) add significantly to the prediction of self-reported victimisation. The results are discussed against the background of other study findings, accentuating the significance of gender- and age-specific forms of bullying/victimisation. Aggr. Behav. 32:1–15, 2006. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scheithauer et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a074d8b176052a461d3b8behttps://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploring developmental psychology : from infancy to adolescence1999 · 13 citations
  2. 2Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: A multiinformant approach.1998 · 653 citations
  3. 3The Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression2013 · 2,763 citations
  4. 4Peer harassment in school: the plight of the vulnerable and victimized2002 · 1,361 citations
  5. 5Relational Aggression, Gender, and Social-Psychological Adjustment1995 · 2,344 citations