PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2002Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging91 citations

TrueFISP: Assessment of accuracy for measurement of left ventricular mass in an animal model

View Full Paper
DFDavid S. FienoWJWyatt C. JaffeOSOrlando P. Simonetti

Structured PICO

Does TrueFISP MRI accurately measure left ventricular mass compared to post-mortem true mass in a dog model?

P
Population
Dogs (N=10)
I
Intervention
TrueFISP MRI on 1.5-T scanner (segmented k-space cine images and single-shot images)
C
Comparator
True mass of the left ventricle (free wall and septum) determined post-mortem
O
Outcome
Accuracy of computed LV mass compared to actual masssurrogate

TrueFISP imaging is an accurate and rapid method to determine ventricular mass, with segmented k-space cine-systole measuring LV mass to within 3% of the true value.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the accuracy of a high performance true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP) pulse sequence for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) mass in a large animal model on 1.5-T scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We imaged dogs (N = 10) on a clinical 1.5-T clinical scanner using electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated TrueFISP. In all animals, contiguous segmented k-space cine images were acquired from base to apex (in-plane resolution 1 x 1 mm(2), slice thickness 5 mm, TR = 4.8 msec, TE = 1.6 msec) during repeated breath-holds. In nine of the 10 animals, single-shot images gated to end-diastole were also acquired from base to apex in a single breath-hold (in-plane resolution 1 x 1 mm(2), slice thickness 5 mm, TR = 3.2 msec, TE = 1.6 msec). After imaging, animals were killed, the left ventricle was isolated, and the true mass of the left ventricle (free wall and septum) was determined. Independently, two observers blinded to the post-mortem results computed LV masses based on analysis of the magnetic resonance (MR) images. RESULTS: Comparison of the computed LV mass using TrueFISP to the actual mass showed excellent agreement. Cine-systole was the most accurate technique (mass = 98.6% +/- 4.5% actual, bias = 1.2 +/- 3.4 g) followed by cine-diastole (mass = 97.9% +/- 5.3% actual, bias = 1.8 +/- 4.1 g) and single shot (mass = 94.7% +/- 7.9% actual, bias = 4.2 +/- 6.3 g). Inter- and intra-observer variabilities were low (5.8% +/- 7.1% and 0.4% +/- 4.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: We conclude that TrueFISP imaging is an accurate, rapid method to determine ventricular mass. In single-shot mode, TrueFISP requires only one breath-hold to estimate the mass of the heart within 6% of the actual value, whereas the segmented k-space implementation measured LV mass to within 3% of the true value.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fieno et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0762c5fa6637d4ea841ad7https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mass of left ventricular myocardium estimated with dynamic spatial reconstructor1984 · 41 citations
  2. 2Regional differences in function within noninfarcted myocardium during left ventricular remodeling.1993 · 254 citations
  3. 3Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Experimental observations and clinical implications.1990 · 2,878 citations
  4. 4Angiotensin II Antagonism and the Heart: Valsartan in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy1999 · 20 citations
  5. 5Structural remodeling in hypertensive heart disease and the role of hormones.1994 · 233 citations