PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2010Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging76 citationsOpen Access

MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: Methods, reliability and descriptive statistics

View Full Paper
BWBruce A. WassermanBABrad C. AstorASA. Richey Sharrett

Key Result

Contrast-enhanced MRI of carotid plaque showed high repeat scan reliability for lumen area (ICC 0.89-0.94) and maximum wall thickness (ICC 0.77-0.89), but lower reliability for small structures.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=2,066)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
2066 participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study at four sites (1769 successful MRI exams, mean age 71 years; 57% females; 81% white; 19% African-Americans).
I
Intervention
Contrast-enhanced high-resolution (0.51 x 0.58 x 2 mm³) MRI of internal and common carotid arteries.
O
Outcome
Reliability of plaque component thicknesses, areas, and volumes measurements evaluated by intraclass correlations and kappa statistics.surrogate

Limitations

  • Reader variability is the most important limiting factor for MRI measurements of plaque components.
  • Measurement error depends largely on the analyzed structure's size.
  • Reader variability is the most important limiting factor
  • Measurement error depends largely on the analyzed structure's size

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure carotid plaque components using MRI and estimate reliability in the population-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced high-resolution (0.51 x 0.58 x 2 mm(3)) MRI images were acquired through internal (ICA) and common carotid arteries (CCA) of 2066 ARIC participants at four sites. Sixty-one exams were repeated and 164 pairs had repeated interpretations. Plaque component thicknesses, areas and volumes over eight slices (1.6-cm segment) were measured. Intraplaque hemorrhage was recorded. Reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlations and kappa statistics. RESULTS: There were 1769 successful MRI exams (mean age 71 years; 57% females; 81% white; 19% African-Americans). Repeat scan reliability was highest for CCA lumen area (0.94) and maximum wall thickness (0.89), ICA lumen area (0.89) and maximum wall thickness (0.77) and total wall volume (0.79), and lowest for small structures-core volume (0.30) and mean cap thickness (0.38). Overall reliability was primarily related to reader variability rather than scan acquisition. K's for presence of core, calcification and hemorrhage were fair to good. White men had the thickest plaques (average maximum ICA wall thickness = 2.3 mm) and the most cores (34%). CONCLUSION: The most important limiting factor for MRI measurements of plaque components is reader variability. Measurement error depends largely on the analyzed structure's size.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wasserman et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Atherosclerosis (n=2,066). Contrast-enhanced high-resolution MRI was evaluated on Repeat scan reliability (intraclass correlations) for plaque component thicknesses, areas and volumes. Contrast-enhanced MRI of carotid plaque showed high repeat scan reliability for lumen area (ICC 0.89-0.94) and maximum wall thickness (ICC 0.77-0.89), but lower reliability for small structures.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07893cc9983f2ec4c6408fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper