PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2020EuroIntervention71 citationsOpen Access

Management of myocardial revascularisation failure: an expert consensus document of the EAPCI

GSGiulio StefaniniFAFernándo AlfonsoEBEmanuele Barbato

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients experiencing myocardial revascularisation failure (failure of percutaneous coronary interventions, failure of coronary artery bypass grafting, or progression of coronary artery disease in previously untreated native segments)
I
Intervention
Clinical management strategies for myocardial revascularisation failure

This EAPCI expert consensus document provides a comprehensive, patient-oriented framework for the clinical management of myocardial revascularisation failure.

Abstract

Myocardial revascularisation represents the most frequently performed therapeutic intervention worldwide. Current percutaneous and surgical revascularisation techniques provide excellent short- and long-term clinical outcomes. However, despite the technological and procedural advances with the widespread use of drug-eluting stents and arterial bypass grafts in contemporary practice, a considerable proportion of patients require repeat revascularisation procedures during long-term follow-up. The need for repeat revascularisation has a major impact on patients' quality of life and is associated with a significant economic burden. This consensus document summarises the views on the management of myocardial revascularisation failure of an expert panel of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). The present document provides a broad and pragmatic overview of the clinical management of myocardial revascularisation failure with a focus on the three key underlying mechanisms leading to repeat revascularisation: 1) failure of percutaneous coronary interventions, 2) failure of coronary artery bypass grafting, and 3) progression of coronary artery disease in native coronary segments previously untreated. The aim of the present position document is to provide a patient-oriented approach for the management of myocardial revascularisation failure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stefanini et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07f750ce75e6e4a9735bb5https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-20-00487
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1‘Ten Commandments’ for the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization2018 · 810 citations
  2. 2Percutaneous catheter-based repeat revascularization in patients with previous PCI or CABG: a comprehensive review of the evidence2022
  3. 3Current Concepts in Revascularization for Ischemic Heart Disease With Reduced Ejection Fraction2025
  4. 4High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction deemed not suitable for surgical revascularisation. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) in collaboration with the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Revascularisation for Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy2023 · 8 citations