PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2000ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction1,461 citations

Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing

View Full Paper
GAGregory D. AbowdEMElizabeth D. Mynatt

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The proliferation of computing into the physical world promises more than the ubiquitous availability of computing infrastructure; it suggest new paradigms of interaction inspired by constant access to information and computational capabilities. For the past decade, application-driven research on abiquitous computing (ubicomp) has pushed three interaction themes: natural interfaces, context-aware applications, and automated capture and access . To chart a course for future research in ubiquitous computing, we review the accomplishments of these efforts and point to remaining research challenges. Research in ubiquitious computing implicitly requires addressing some notion of scale, whether in the number and type of devices, the physical space of distributed computing, or the number of people using a system. We posit a new area of applications research, everyday computing, focussed on scaling interaction with respect to time. Just as pushing the availiability of computing away from the traditional desktop fundamentally changes the relationship between humans and computers, providing continuous interaction moves computing from a localized tool to a constant companion. Designing for continous interaction requires addressing interruption and reumption of intreaction, representing passages of time and providing associative storage models. Inherent in all of these interaction themes are difficult issues in the social implications of ubiquitous computing and the challenges of evaluating> ubiquitious computing research. Although cumulative experience points to lessons in privacy, security, visibility, and control, there are no simple guidelines for steering research efforts. Akin to any efforts involving new technologies, evaluation strategies form a spectrum from technology feasibility efforts to long-term use studies—but a user-centric perspective is always possible and necessary

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abowd et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07faca09b3c82015378f48https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.344988
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1PHONE SLAVE: A GRAPHICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERFACE1985 · 26 citations
  2. 2Putting people first1994 · 23 citations
  3. 3A Software System for Education at a Distance: Case Study Results1999 · 10 citations
  4. 4Finding and using implicit structure in human-organized spatial layouts of information1995 · 149 citations
  5. 5As We May Think1945 · 3,013 citations