PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 8, 2005Archives of Internal Medicine446 citations

Opposite Bone Remodeling Effects of Teriparatide and Alendronate in Increasing Bone Mass

View Full Paper
MMMichael R. McClungJMJavier San MartínPMPaul D. Miller

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antiresorptive agents for the treatment of osteoporosis suppress bone remodeling and reestablish bone turnover at a lower rate to reduce bone loss. Recombinant teriparatide (human parathyroid hormone 1-34) stimulates bone formation, increases bone mass, and improves bone microarchitecture. We contrasted the effects of once-daily doses of 20 mug of teriparatide and 10 mg of alendronate sodium on bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover. METHODS: Markers of bone turnover and areal BMD were assessed in 203 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in an 18-month randomized parallel double-blind study; volumetric BMD was measured in a subset of women. RESULTS: Teriparatide significantly increased markers of bone turnover that peaked at 6 months (serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, 218%, and urinary N-telopeptide corrected for creatinine, 58%; P<.001); alendronate significantly decreased the markers at 6 months (-67% and -72%, respectively; P<.001). At 18 months, areal and volumetric spine BMDs were significantly higher with teriparatide than with alendronate (10.3% vs 5.5% P<.001 and 19.0% vs 3.8% P<.01, respectively). Areal femoral neck BMD was significantly higher than baseline in the teriparatide and alendronate groups (3.9% and 3.5%, respectively). There were no significant differences in trabecular femoral neck BMD between the teriparatide and alendronate groups (4.9% and 2.2%, respectively). Cortical volumetric femoral neck BMD was significantly different between the teriparatide and alendronate groups (-1.2% and 7.7%, respectively; P = .05). CONCLUSION: Two distinct options for the management of osteoporosis lead to increases in BMD by opposite mechanisms of action on bone remodeling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McClung et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a07fbd3f1d046f829735ea3https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.15.1762
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1[Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis].2004 · 64 citations
  2. 2Effect of Risedronate on the Risk of Hip Fracture in Elderly Women2001 · 36 citations
  3. 3Comparison of self-reported with objectively assessed energy expenditure in black and white women before and after weight loss2004 · 96 citations
  4. 4Teriparatide [PTH(1–34)] Strengthens the Proximal Femur of Ovariectomized Nonhuman Primates Despite Increasing Porosity2004 · 154 citations
  5. 5Risedronate Preserves Bone Architecture in Early Postmenopausal Women In 1 Year as Measured by Three-Dimensional Microcomputed Tomography2003 · 167 citations