PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026The Lancet Neurology1 citationsOpen Access

Identification of genetic modifiers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: a genome-wide association study

View Full Paper
MPMaulikkumar PatelWFWei FengNMNicole S. McKay

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify new genetic modifiers in individuals with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease caused by specific mutations.
  • Conducted a genome-wide association study with whole-genome sequencing on 101 symptomatic and 5050 asymptomatic participants.
  • Analyzed associations between risk variants, clinical features, and biological markers, including plasma proteins and CSF concentrations.
  • Performed sensitivity analyses including related participants for comprehensive assessment.
  • Three loci significantly associated with ADAD risk irrespective of the specific gene mutation.
  • CNIH4 locus linked to a missense variant showing OR 11.99, p<0.0001, with implications for age at dementia onset.
  • RHOJ risk allele associated with increased CSF tau levels and lower Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, indicating disrupted Alzheimer’s pathology.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) arising from mutations in PSEN1, PSEN2, or APP exhibit variability in clinical presentation. Genetic studies of ADAD have shaped our understanding of the disease, and the discovery of genetic modifiers can inform therapeutic interventions and improve patient outcomes. We aimed to discover new genetic modifiers in individuals with mutations in the three ADAD genes. METHODS: In this genome-wide association study, we analysed data from participants in three study cohorts (the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center Knight-ADRC, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network DIAN observational study, and the Alzheimer Disease Sequencing Project ADSP R4). We did whole-genome sequencing on 101 unrelated, non-Hispanic, White, symptomatic participants with ADAD mutations and 5050 asymptomatic, unrelated control participants. Sensitivity analyses included related participants (148 cases and 5813 controls). We assessed the molecular mechanisms associated with each risk variant, including cis-regulatory effects, plasma protein levels (Knight-ADRC, 2338 participants), CSF concentrations of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers (DIAN, 64 participants), and neuroimaging data (MRI and PET; DIAN, 64 participants). We evaluated the association of risk variants with age at onset in ADAD and in 6177 participants with sporadic Alzheimer's disease (ADSP R5). FINDINGS: Three genome-wide loci with significant risk were associated with ADAD risk, irrespective of the specific ADAD gene mutation. The CNIH4 locus association was driven by a missense variant (is caused by Gly54Ser, p<0·0001, odds ratio OR 11·99 5·39-26·64). The CCNG1 locus risk allele increased the risk of Alzheimer's disease (p<0·0001, OR 9·56 4·29-21·24) and reduced the age at dementia onset (p=0·0068, β=-10·15 95% CI -17·31 to -2·77). This allele was also positively associated with Tar DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) plasma protein levels and a larger gap between chronological age and structural MRI predicted brain age. The RHOJ risk allele (p<0·0001, OR 5·96 3·42-10·36) was associated with increased the risk of Alzheimer's disease, higher CSF total tau (p=0·0056, β=358·37) and phosphorated tau 181 (pTau181; p=0·0006, β=81·28), and lower Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (p=0·016, β=-0·11) in DIAN ADAD participants, comparing those carrying the risk allele with those not carrying it. INTERPRETATION: Our findings provide potential insights into disease biology, emphasising the role of Aβ, tau, TDP-43, astrocytes, and angiogenesis in Alzheimer's disease aetiology. This study offers invaluable insight for family genetic counselling and future clinical trial designs. FUNDING: National Institute of Health, National Institute on Aging, Alzheimer's Association, Hope Center Pilot 2025 Award, NGI Pilot Grant 2025 Award, BrightFocus Foundation, UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, UK National Institutes for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, Freedom Together Foundation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0808afa487c87a6a40ae40https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(26)00123-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rare genetic variation in fibronectin 1 (FN1) protects against APOEε4 in Alzheimer’s disease2024 · 54 citations
  2. 2APOE3 Christchurch Heterozygosity and Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease2024 · 61 citations
  3. 3Genetic and multi-omic resources for Alzheimer disease and related dementia from the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center2024 · 36 citations
  4. 4The concept of resilience to Alzheimer’s Disease: current definitions and cellular and molecular mechanisms2024 · 76 citations
  5. 5APOE*E2 allele delays age of onset in PSEN1 E280A Alzheimer’s disease2015 · 112 citations