PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Frontiers in Sports and Active Living0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative biomechanical analysis of volleyball court shoes during sport-specific tasks in competitive adolescent female volleyball players

ADAva N. DavisAHAriel HuangAEAshley Erdman

Key Points

  • This study aims to investigate how different volleyball court shoes affect biomechanical movement patterns in female players.
  • Twenty-nine healthy female volleyball players participated in biomechanical tests.
  • Players performed a countermovement jump and a three-step approach using a motion capture system and force plates.
  • Three different types of volleyball shoes were evaluated for lower-extremity joint angles during the tests.
  • RIP-IT shoes showed the least dorsiflexion and the greatest knee flexion during landings.
  • Mizuno shoes increased dynamic knee valgus contributions (p ≤ 0.013).
  • Adidas shoes limited ankle inversion and internal rotation compared to both RIP-IT and Mizuno shoes (p ≤ 0.015).

Abstract

Introduction High-level volleyball requires efficient movement patterns, force attenuation, and rapid, multidirectional movements. While players may exhibit inherent biomechanical risk factors, investigating how footwear affects female athletes' movement is essential for developing a comprehensive understanding of determinants contributing to injury risk. The purpose of this study was to identify biomechanical differences associated with three volleyball court shoes. Methods Twenty-nine healthy female volleyball players (15.52 ± 1.47 years, 168.72 ± 5.72 cm, 62.44 ± 7.71 kg) completed a countermovement jump (CMJ) and three-step approach in a motion capture laboratory using a markerless motion capture system and embedded force plates under three shoe conditions. Peak lower-extremity joint angles were calculated and extracted across the landing phase. Results RIP-IT shoes elicited the least dorsiflexion and the greatest knee flexion and external rotation. Mizuno shoes were associated with greater contributors to dynamic knee valgus during the CMJ ( p ≤ 0.013). Adidas shoes limited ankle inversion ROM compared to RIP-IT ( p = 0.005) and ankle internal rotation compared to RIP-IT and Mizuno ( p ≤ 0.015) during the CMJ. Discussion Biomechanical risk factor associations differed across shoe conditions, with RIP-IT shoes limiting shock absorption strategies, Mizuno shoes increasing contributors to dynamic knee valgus, and Adidas shoes limiting ankle ROM. These results demonstrate that different volleyball shoes influence lower extremity kinematics and joint loading, with the most pronounced differences observed at the ankle and compensatory changes at the knee and hip, highlighting how footwear can measurably alter movement strategies during sport-specific tasks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Davis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0808afa487c87a6a40aec7https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1824023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative Kinematic Analysis Across Three Volleyball Shoes During Countermovement Jump in Elite Adolescent Female Volleyball Players2026
  2. 2843 MEP172 – Pilot study investigating effects of two athletic shoe types on ground contact loads and dynamic valgus during three change of direction tasks2024
  3. 3COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LANDING BIOMECHANICS BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE VOLLEYBALL PLAYERS2023
  4. 4Acute Change of Footwear Limits Performance and Alters Foot Strike Patterns During Anticipated and Unanticipated 90° Change of Direction2025
  5. 5Effects of lower limb biomechanical characteristics on jump performance in female volleyball players based on long Stretch–Shortening cycle movements2025 · 4 citations