PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation at Land South of Hardwicke, Gloucester

View Full Paper
LSLouis StaffordIDIsaac Derbyshire

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the archaeological significance of land proposed for development by excavating targeted trenches.
  • Excavation of 87 evaluation trenches, each 50m x 1.8m, across various areas of the site.
  • Trenches positioned based on geophysical survey results to identify archaeological features and investigate undisturbed areas.
  • Analysis of cultivated land to determine the degree of disturbance from previous agricultural activities.
  • Area 1 revealed a rectangular enclosure dated to the Late Iron Age extending into the Roman period, with evidence of internal partitions.
  • Geophysical survey results accurately correlated with excavation findings, particularly in Area 1.
  • Area 2 showed continued Roman activity with boundary ditches and some manufacturing evidence in Area 9.

Abstract

The archaeological fieldwork consisted of the excavation of 87 (97 proposed) 50m x 1.8m evaluation trenches. The trenches were positioned in relation to the impact area of the proposed new development and to target the potential archaeological features identified in the geophysical survey and investigate potentially blank areas of site. All areas have been cultivated to some extent, Area 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 were grassland fields, so were less disturbed, but upon excavation it became evident they have been previously altered/disturbed by agricultural activity or sewage management. The geophysical survey was accurate and correlated for the most part with what was found, notably in Area 1. This area appears to be a rectangular enclosure with possible Late Iron Age origins which spans the Roman period. The enclosure shows on the geophysics a series of internal partitions, however not all of these were noted in the evaluation. Area 2 appeared to be a continuation of this Roman activity with boundary ditches extending from the enclosure with some peripheral manufacturing activity in Area 9.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stafford et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0809bea487c87a6a40b957https://doi.org/10.5284/1141935
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper