PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences2 citationsOpen Access

World models, artificial general intelligence and the hard problems of life–mind continuity: toward a unified understanding of natural and artificial intelligence

View Full Paper
ASAdam SafronMLMichael LevinVKVictoria Klimaj

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how natural and artificial intelligences model the world, exploring cognitive implications and relationships between life and mind.
  • Examines diverse forms of world modeling such as causal, self-referential, goal-directed, collective, and narrative types.
  • Explores the emergence and functionality of world models in both biological and artificial systems.
  • Raises questions about the learning and contextual capabilities of current AI systems compared to biological intelligences.
  • Identifies the similarities and divergences between natural and artificial intelligence in modeling worlds.
  • Highlights the challenges AI faces in replicating the context-sensitive and value-laden dimensions of biological cognitions.
  • Outlines key themes for future research on world modeling and its implications for understanding intelligence.

Abstract

Abstract This special issue examines how natural and artificial intelligences (AIs) model the world, and what this modelling reveals about cognition and relationships between life and mind. Rather than adopting a single definition, the collection considers how world models function and emerge in biological and artificial systems, exploring a diverse range of world modelling including causal, self-referential, individual goal-directed, collective and narrative forms. A recurring theme is the extent to which current AI systems trained on vast quantities of data learn the context-sensitive, temporally embedded, value-laden dimensions of world modelling that characterize diverse biological intelligences, or whether their impressive capabilities arise primarily from statistical surface regularities. The contributions also raise broader issues concerning embodiment, complexity, learning architectures and the social and scientific contexts in which world models operate. With this collection, we hope to clarify the conceptual landscape, identify key points of similarity and divergence between natural and artificial minds, and outline questions that may guide future research on the forms of world modelling that support grounded understanding, robust agency and potentially human-like general intelligence. This article is part of the theme issue ‘World models in natural and artificial intelligence’.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Safron et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0809f1a487c87a6a40bbeehttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0533
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper