Vehicle-Integrated Photovoltaics (VIPV) in Electrified Mobility: A Structured Systematic Review of Technical Performance, System Integration, and Strategic Deployment

The rapid electrification of road transport has increased interest in distributed energy strategies that reduce grid demand and support decarbonization. Vehicle-integrated photovoltaics (VIPV), including vehicle-applied photovoltaic configurations (VAPV), can generate electricity directly on the vehicle. This systematic review examines peer-reviewed VIPV literature published between 2015 and 2026, focusing on the distinction between theoretical photovoltaic generation and practically usable energy. A Scopus search conducted on 2 May 2026 identified 196 records, of which 88 studies were included after screening against predefined criteria. Due to heterogeneity in vehicle types, climates, technologies, modeling assumptions, and reported metrics, no meta-analysis was performed. Instead, the review applies a multi-layered framework covering climate, geometry, thermal effects, electrical mismatch, battery state-of-charge interactions, fleet-scale modeling, economics, and life-cycle implications. The evidence shows that VIPV is technically feasible and can deliver measurable energy yields, especially in high-irradiance regions and vehicles with favorable daytime parking exposure. However, useful contribution depends strongly on curvature losses, dynamic shading, electrical configuration, SOC limits, charging behavior, seasonality, and vehicle energy demand. Therefore, VIPV is best understood as a context-dependent supplementary energy strategy rather than a transformative standalone solution. Its strongest value lies in specific vehicle classes, climates, and usage patterns where on-board generation can reduce charging demand, support operational resilience, or improve distributed self-consumption. The review also proposes minimum reporting requirements for future studies, including annual energy yield, Wh/km contribution, PV area or capacity, mileage assumptions, SOC modeling, and curtailment treatment. The review was not formally registered, and no formal risk-of-bias or certainty assessment was applied.