PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Journal of Radiation Research0 citationsOpen Access

Prioritizing radiotherapy infrastructure in depopulating societies: a 2050 blueprint from Akita, Japan

View Full Paper
YKYuhei KoikeKansai Medical UniversitySNSatoaki NakamuraKansai Medical UniversityYWYuki WadaTokyo Medical University

Key Points

  • The research aims to optimize the placement of IMRT-capable radiotherapy facilities in Akita Prefecture by addressing geographic inequities in access due to population decline.
  • Used 1-km mesh population data for 2020 alongside official projections for 2030, 2040, and 2050.
  • Calculated one-way travel times to facilities using Open Source Routing Machine and OpenStreetMap data, with a 60-min travel-time threshold for access.
  • Determined optimal placement using a population-weighted p-median model with a facility target of one per 200,000 population.
  • In 2020, 10 external-beam RT facilities provided near-universal coverage (99.99%), while a single IMRT facility covered only 70.3%.
  • Optimized placement of five IMRT facilities increased access coverage to 99.99% and reduced mean travel time to 14.2 min.
  • Over time, optimized placement maintained access coverage above 99% with only three facilities, consistently selecting stable core locations.

Abstract

Abstract In super-aged and depopulating societies, repeated travel requirements for radiotherapy (RT) can amplify geographic inequities in access to advanced techniques. The aim of this study was to determine optimal placement of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-capable facilities in Akita Prefecture—a leading-edge case of Japan's demographic transition—using p-median optimization under population projections through 2050. Using 1-km mesh population data for 2020 and official projections for 2030, 2040 and 2050, we calculated one-way automobile travel times from each mesh centroid to RT facilities with the Open Source Routing Machine based on OpenStreetMap road data. A 60-min travel-time threshold defined access coverage. IMRT-capable facilities were identified from official insurance-designation lists. Optimal placement was determined using a population-weighted p-median model, with the number of facilities prespecified as one per 200 000 population. In 2020, 10 external-beam RT facilities provided near-universal 60-min coverage (99.99%; mean 12.8 min), whereas the single IMRT-capable facility covered only 70.3% (uncovered 285 273; mean 42.5 min). Optimized placement with five IMRT-capable facilities increased coverage to 99.99% (uncovered 89) and reduced mean travel time to 14.2 min. Under population projections, optimized placement maintained 99% coverage through 2050 with three facilities, and three core locations were consistently selected across all time horizons. These temporally stable core locations can serve as priority targets for long-term IMRT infrastructure investment in aging and depopulating regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koike et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080ae2a487c87a6a40cf3ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrag033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper