PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Surgical Decision-Making in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study from a Tertiary Center

View Full Paper
FBFlorin BobircaCarol Davila University of Medicine and PharmacyDDD. DumitrescuCarol Davila University of Medicine and PharmacyFGFlorentina GherghiceanuCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the frequency and clinical parameters of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in breast cancer patients.
  • Conducted an observational, retrospective study of 101 breast cancer patients
  • Analyzed surgical interventions performed from January 2024 to April 2025
  • Compared clinical and paraclinical parameters between two surgical techniques.
  • Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) represented 36.6% of cases, while modified radical mastectomy accounted for 63.4%
  • Average hemoglobin level at admission was 13 g/dL, significantly differing between BCS (13.7) and mastectomy (12.7) at p=0.010
  • Surgical choice is influenced by factors like disease stage and histopathological subtype.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The main objective of the study was to determine the frequency of patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and those with modified radical mastectomy and to compare the clinical–paraclinical parameters between these groups. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective study, which included 101 patients diagnosed with breast cancer that had surgical interventions between January 2024 and April 2025. Results: The BCS category was represented by 36.6% cases, while 63.4% were in the mastectomy subgroup. Hemoglobin at the time of admission had an average of 13 g/dL, the difference between the two categories of patients being statistically significant. (13.7 vs. 12.7, p = 0.010). Conclusions: Although it has been a hotly debated topic in recent years, the choice of surgical technique for breast tumors still presents novelties and remains a subject of interest within surgical specialties. Selection criteria such as disease stage, histopathological subtype, and the intervention chosen by the surgeon may vary and oncological results may be comparable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bobirca et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080af2a487c87a6a40cff2https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103770
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Locoregional recurrence and survival of breast−conserving surgery compared to mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Postoperative complications after salvage mastectomy and repeat breast-conserving surgery in patients with IBTR after previous breast-conserving surgery: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Decoding breast cancer: insights into molecular pathways & therapeutic approaches2025 · 7 citations
  4. 4MFF-ClassificationNet: CNN-Transformer Hybrid with Multi-Feature Fusion for Breast Cancer Histopathology Classification2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5The Characteristics of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma and the Particularities for Elderly Patients—Experience of a Single Clinic2023 · 6 citations