PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 16, 2026Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Upfront Surgery in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

View Full Paper
YSYu–Fu SuPSPo‐Chien ShenYHYi-Jan Hsia

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Retrospective analysis of 98 patients treated for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma between 2011 and 2017.
  • Survival outcomes including overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and local control evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
  • Follow-up duration was a median of 77.8 months.
  • No significant differences in overall survival (OS: HR 1.31, p=0.415), cancer-specific survival (CSS: HR 1.36, p=0.421), or local control (LC: HR 1.29, p=0.475) were observed between induction chemotherapy and upfront surgery.
  • Positive surgical margins independently predicted inferior outcomes for overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and local control.
  • Extracapsular spread was independently associated with inferior cancer-specific survival.

Abstract

Background: The optimal role of induction chemotherapy (IC) in the management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) remains controversial. This study compared oncologic outcomes between IC followed by surgery and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and upfront surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 98 patients with OCSCC treated between 2011 and 2017. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models to identify prognostic factors. Results: Fifty patients received IC and 48 underwent upfront surgery. With a median follow-up of 77.8 months, no significant differences in OS, CSS, or LC were observed between treatment groups (OS: HR 1.31, p = 0.415; CSS: HR 1.36, p = 0.421; LC: HR 1.29, p = 0.475). Positive surgical margins independently predicted inferior OS, CSS, and LC, while extracapsular spread was independently associated with inferior CSS. Although tumor downstaging was frequently observed after IC, it did not translate into survival benefit. Conclusions: IC followed by surgery was associated with no statistically significant differences in oncologic outcomes compared with upfront surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT. Prognosis was primarily determined by pathological risk factors rather than treatment sequence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Su et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b4ea487c87a6a40d80ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101590
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Peritumoral Invasion and Survival in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma—The Role of Perineural and Lymphovascular Invasion2025 · 6 citations
  2. 2Spatial heterogeneity of MDSCs mediated by ANXA1-FPRs signaling drives immune suppression in OSCC progression2026 · 17 citations
  3. 3Distribution of adverse pathological features and prognosis across tongue, buccal, gum, and other oral cancer subsites: A nationwide study2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Extracapsular spread2001 · 331 citations
  5. 5Margins in Stage I and II Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma2023 · 15 citations