PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2012BMC Medical Research Methodology277 citationsOpen Access

Interpreting the concordance statistic of a logistic regression model: relation to the variance and odds ratio of a continuous explanatory variable

PAPeter C. AustinESEwout W. Steyerberg

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When outcomes are binary, the c-statistic (equivalent to the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve) is a standard measure of the predictive accuracy of a logistic regression model. METHODS: An analytical expression was derived under the assumption that a continuous explanatory variable follows a normal distribution in those with and without the condition. We then conducted an extensive set of Monte Carlo simulations to examine whether the expressions derived under the assumption of binormality allowed for accurate prediction of the empirical c-statistic when the explanatory variable followed a normal distribution in the combined sample of those with and without the condition. We also examine the accuracy of the predicted c-statistic when the explanatory variable followed a gamma, log-normal or uniform distribution in combined sample of those with and without the condition. RESULTS: Under the assumption of binormality with equality of variances, the c-statistic follows a standard normal cumulative distribution function with dependence on the product of the standard deviation of the normal components (reflecting more heterogeneity) and the log-odds ratio (reflecting larger effects). Under the assumption of binormality with unequal variances, the c-statistic follows a standard normal cumulative distribution function with dependence on the standardized difference of the explanatory variable in those with and without the condition. In our Monte Carlo simulations, we found that these expressions allowed for reasonably accurate prediction of the empirical c-statistic when the distribution of the explanatory variable was normal, gamma, log-normal, and uniform in the entire sample of those with and without the condition. CONCLUSIONS: The discriminative ability of a continuous explanatory variable cannot be judged by its odds ratio alone, but always needs to be considered in relation to the heterogeneity of the population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Austin et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08246b113ba5b476ddfc6fhttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-82
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine2011 · 1,797 citations
  2. 2Standard Distance in Univariate and Multivariate Analysis1986 · 287 citations
  3. 3Effectiveness of Public Report Cards for Improving the Quality of Cardiac Care2009 · 259 citations
  4. 4Regression Modeling Strategies2015 · 6,768 citations
  5. 5The impact of genotype frequencies on the clinical validity of genomic profiling for predicting common chronic diseases2007 · 152 citations