PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1996Journal of Pharmacy Technology5 citations

Anticoagulant Clinic Warfarin Adherence Rates and Assessment

View Full Paper
BMBarb J Mason

Key Result

Electronic medication-event monitoring revealed that 35% of patients were nonadherent with warfarin therapy (mean adherence 86%), with no significant correlation between INR and adherence.

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate warfarin medication-taking patterns and the connection between adherence and INR values.
  • Two-month, single-blind, observational cohort design.
  • Twenty-three veteran outpatients in a nurse-managed anticoagulation clinic were enrolled, with 20 evaluable patients.
  • All patients used warfarin with an electronic medication-event monitoring system (MEMS) device.
  • 35% of patients were nonadherent to warfarin therapy.
  • Mean warfarin adherence rate was 86%, with a preclinic rate of 90%.
  • In 75% of patients, medication-taking behavior was underestimated.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=23)

Blinding

Single-blind

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

What are the true warfarin adherence rates measured by electronic monitoring, and do they correlate with INR values in veteran outpatients?

P
Population
23 veteran outpatients (20 evaluable) followed in a nurse-managed anticoagulation clinic. Excluded: use of medication reminder device, scheduled warfarin discontinuation within 2 months, or receiving warfarin <1 month.
I
Intervention
Warfarin dispensed in a vial with an electronic medication-event monitoring system (MEMS) device for 2 months.
O
Outcome
Mean and preclinic warfarin adherence, dosage changes, and INR valuessurrogate

Electronic monitoring of warfarin adherence reveals that nonadherence is common (35%) and often underestimated, yet does not significantly correlate with INR values.

Abstract

Objective: To identify warfarin medication-taking patterns and the relationship between adherence and international normalized ratio (INR). Design: Two-month, single-blind, observational cohort. Setting: Veterans Affairs Medical Center ambulatory care clinics. Patients: Twenty-three veteran outpatients followed in a nurse-managed anticoagulation clinic were enrolled by consecutive sample. Patients were excluded if they used a medication reminder device, were scheduled to have warfarin discontinued within the next 2 months, or had been receiving warfarin less than 1 month. Twenty patients were evaluable. Intervention: All study patients received warfarin in a vial with an electronic medication-event monitoring system (MEMS) device. Patients were not told that adherence was being monitored. Main Outcome Measure: Mean and preclinic warfarin adherence, dosage changes, and INR values were tabulated. Results: Thirty-five percent of the patients were nonadherent with warfarin therapy. Mean and preclinic warfarin adherence rates were 86% and 90%, respectively. Medication-taking behavior was underestimated in 75% of patients. Dosage changes were more common in nonadherent patients. There was not a significant correlation between INR and adherence. Conclusions: MEMS adherence data could have changed pharmacologic management in select patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barb J Mason (1996) conducted a cohort in Patients receiving warfarin therapy (n=23). Electronic medication-event monitoring system (MEMS) device was evaluated on Mean and preclinic warfarin adherence, dosage changes, and INR values. Electronic medication-event monitoring revealed that 35% of patients were nonadherent with warfarin therapy (mean adherence 86%), with no significant correlation between INR and adherence.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0827cd280cd4e998e8aa94https://doi.org/10.1177/875512259601200307
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Poor Compliance Is a Major Factor in Unstable Outpatient Control of Anticoagulant Therapy1989 · 98 citations
  2. 2COMPLIANCE WITH ANTICOAGULANT DRUG THERAPY A STUDY ON PATIENTS WITH PROSTHETIC HEART VALVES1981 · 6 citations
  3. 3Assessment of Sulfonylurea Adherence and Metabolic Control1995 · 70 citations
  4. 4Therapeutic control of anticoagulant treatment.1982 · 43 citations
  5. 5ANTICOAGULANT CONTROL1981 · 15 citations